To read this content please select one of the options below:

Toward epistemological identification of the four major mindscapes

Kamal Fatehi (Management, Kennesaw State University Kennesaw, Georgia, United States Of America)
Gita Taasoobshirazi (Kennesaw State University College of Science and Mathematics Kennesaw, Georgia, United States Of America)
Jose Sanchez-Gutierrez (University of Guadalajara Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico)

Review of International Business and Strategy

ISSN: 2059-6014

Article publication date: 11 October 2021

Issue publication date: 23 September 2022

72

Abstract

Purpose

Japanese American philosopher Magoroh Maruyama (1969) proposed the Mindscape theory, a macro model of cultural differences identification. The theory suggests inter-and intra-cultural heterogeneity and four major Mindscapes of H, I, S and G. He and his colleagues designed 64 graphic geometric patterns based on redundant and non-redundant complexity to recognize the Mindscapes in cultures. However, there is no method of identifying each Mindscape individually/separately. In other words, specificity is missing in this theory. Without such identification, the applicability of the Mindscape theory in international business is limited. This study aims to provide the needed specificity.

Design/methodology/approach

The present study applies Harvey’s (1966) four epistemological systems to identify each of the four Mindscapes. According to Maruyama and Harvey, three of Harvey’s four systems are identical to the three Mindscapes of H, I and G. If the authors can match the three Mindscapes with the three Harvey’s systems, what remains the authors assume to be the fourth Mindscape.

Findings

The current study determined various graphic and geometric patterns associated with each of the four Mindscapes. In doing so, the study expanded the applicability of the theory in international business.

Research limitations/implications

Harvey (1966) administered nine psychological tests (instruments) to many subjects over nearly two decades to determine the four systems. Using nine major instruments is very challenging, demanding and time-consuming. For ease of application and saving time, the authors used one of these instruments as an example. Ideally, the authors should use all.

Originality/value

Mindscape theory suggests that each of the four salient Mindscapes is more relevant to a specific situation, such as human resource management, motivation, leadership, conflict resolution and others. By identifying each Mindscape, this study expands the use of Mindscape theory.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The data sets generated and analyzed in the current study are available on request.

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this article to declare.

There is no funding from public or private sources for this manuscript.

The assistance of Elizabeth Boyd, Kenneth Gilliam and Douglas Moodie (USA); Abdelmajid Bouziane and Samira Rguibi (Morocco); and Bolat Tatibekov (Kazakhstan) in data collection is gratefully acknowledged.

Citation

Fatehi, K., Taasoobshirazi, G. and Sanchez-Gutierrez, J. (2022), "Toward epistemological identification of the four major mindscapes", Review of International Business and Strategy, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 484-502. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-02-2021-0031

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles