This study aims to explore the preparers’ perceptions of sustainability reporting as a distinct voluntary corporate reporting practice in the Middle East. It links these perceptions to the influences of local and global institutional contexts and how companies respond to them.
The study is informed by a discursive institutionalism theoretical framework that incorporates concepts such as multiple institutional logics, hybridity in social practice and interpretive role of social agents. Its empirical findings are built on seven interviews with officials involved in the practice to explore their perception of sustainability reports.
Sustainability reporting is not understood and perceived in the same way among reporting companies in the Middle East. The difference in perception is linked to the scope of operations of the company, whether it is global or local. The results provide evidence supporting the theoretical framework. Different institutional logics are identified that interact at the structure level to influence sustainability reporting practice, and companies act at the agency level by selecting from the institutional influences what match their interests and priorities. Consequently, the practice itself will be hybrid and will include various ways and forms of reporting.
The study contributes to knowledge about how global business practices are adopted by companies in the developing countries.
Ismaeel, M. and Zakaria, Z. (2020), "Perception of preparers of sustainability reports in the Middle East: Contrasting between local and global", Meditari Accountancy Research, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 89-116. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2019-0459
Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited