Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to explore the advantage of foreignness in a digital world.
Design/methodology/approach
Usage data for 251 days of 32 travel mobile applications installed on a major mobile phone brand in China are examined. Results support the author’s arguments.
Findings
Foreign mobile apps enjoy higher daily usage time than local apps. Next, the author consider how foreign apps can maximize their advantage, that is, increase daily usage time. The author argue that a multinational enterprise (MNE) can digitally enter a country that has numerous immigrants from its home country because of the high number of potential long tail users. A high level of diversity of international experience of MNEs increases the ability to understand and satisfy the specific needs of long tail users, thereby increasing daily usage time of foreign mobile apps. To maximize the advantage of foreignness in a digital world, MNEs can also carefully select business models that do not heavily rely on network effect, given the difficulty of generating network effect by long tail users.
Originality/value
Previous studies focus on the liability of foreignness or outsidership that MNEs encounter in the digital world, whereas this study argues that foreignness brings certain benefits, such as the capability to satisfy the specific needs of long tail users.
Keywords
Citation
Zhou, N. (2024), "Advantage of foreignness in a digital world: role of long tail users", Multinational Business Review, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-11-2023-0184
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2024, Nan Zhou.
License
Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
Introduction
Digital technologies, including the Internet and mobile technologies, are reshaping the business landscape for firms (Strange and Zucchella, 2017). This digital revolution offers companies worldwide unique opportunities to engage in global competition (Zeng et al., 2019). Notably, firms like Facebook and Airbnb emerge as global players, leveraging platforms for worldwide user interaction (Brouthers et al., 2016). Consequently, the ascent of digital technologies transforms the competitive dynamics confronting multinational enterprises (MNEs) and local firms alike, necessitating adaptation to evolving consumer preferences and competitive pressures.
One hallmark of digitalization is the ubiquity of mobile applications (hereafter, apps), which have become integral to daily life for various tasks such as reading, gaming, shopping and socializing (Ghose and Han, 2014). Foreign mobile apps are also widely used, benefiting from global accessibility via online platforms at no additional cost. Consequently, internationalizing mobile apps focuses less on availability and more on attracting loyal foreign users with significant daily usage.
While scholars increasingly explore the internationalization of mobile apps, attention has predominantly centered on the liability of outsidership in the digital realm (Chen et al., 2019; Shaheer and Li, 2020). Conversely, literature on foreignness suggests that foreignness may confer advantages over local firms, presenting it as an asset (Edman, 2016; Lu et al., 2022). For instance, foreignness could grant MNEs access to preferential treatment unavailable to local counterparts (Kostova and Zaheer, 1999), particularly in emerging markets where host governments welcome foreign investment (Chen, 2007). In contexts marked by pervasive corruption, foreignness can yield positive outcomes, with MNEs from less corrupt nations earning greater trust from local partners compared to domestic firms (Calhoun, 2002).
Yet, scant attention has been paid to the advantage of foreignness for MNEs in the digital world’s globalization. Although prior research on digital firms has explored various strategic and performance aspects such as market entry and platform governance, the advantage of foreignness remains overlooked (Zhu and Iansiti, 2012; Eisenmann et al., 2011). Existing studies on the liability of outsidership have merely highlighted its persistence in the digital realm, with ibusiness firms struggling to transfer network effects across borders (Chen et al., 2019). Understanding the advantage of foreignness in the digital realm and how MNEs can leverage it could aid in overcoming the liability of outsidership and thriving in digital globalization. Hence, examining the advantage of foreignness in the digital domain is imperative.
In this study, I assert that the advantage of foreignness over local firms stems from MNEs’ ability to cater to the specific needs of long tail users, who are defined as a niche market with neglected needs in the traditional economy (Anderson, 2004). Long tail users span various product categories like music and books, and digitalization facilitates meeting their needs more efficiently (Brynjolfsson et al., 2011). In this study, long tail users refer to those with demands akin to those in foreign countries. MNEs’ adeptness in serving these needs enables them to attract such users in host countries, resulting in higher usage times for foreign mobile apps compared to local ones.
Building upon the notion of serving long tail users’ needs, I identify three avenues through which foreign apps can boost users’ daily usage times. Firstly, MNEs can target countries with sizable immigrant populations from their home country, offering access to a large pool of potential long tail users. Secondly, MNEs can leverage their international experience to enhance their capacity in meeting long tail users’ needs. Diverse experiences across countries augment MNEs’ ability to address long tail users’ requirements in host countries. Thirdly, MNEs can adopt specific business models that do not heavily rely on network effects, recognizing the challenge of generating such effects among long tail users (Boudreau and Jeppesen, 2015). To optimize the advantage of foreignness, MNEs must eschew business models heavily reliant on network effects.
I empirically test these propositions using a sample of travel mobile apps in China, examining user data spanning 251 days across 32 mobile apps. My findings support the hypotheses. This study contributes to the foreignness literature in two ways. First, it focuses on the advantage of foreignness. Compared to the long-standing concept of the liability of foreignness (Zaheer, 1995; Scott-Kennel et al., 2022), advantage of foreignness is a newly developed concept that receives relatively less attention (Lu et al., 2022; Un, 2011). How MNEs could benefit from foreignness is not clearly articulated or empirically examined. Different from most studies on advantage of foreignness, which focus on institutional theory, transaction cost or supply-side resources (Lu et al., 2022), this study provides a demand-side mechanism through which MNEs could benefit from foreignness: the capability to serve long tail users. I further examine how foreign apps increase performance by focusing on variables related to long-tail users. This study thus enriches my understanding of how MNEs benefit from foreignness.
Second, this study contributes to the foreignness literature by extending it to the digital context. The impact of foreignness on MNEs largely depends on the specific context that an MNE faces. As Lu et al. (2022) posited “how foreignness is perceived and used in the digital economy holds great promise for advancing theory and practice” (Lu et al., 2022, p. 466). Previous studies in digital firms only focused on the liability of foreignness and showed the negative effect of being foreign mobile apps (Shaheer and Li, 2020). The present study shows the existence of the advantage of foreignness in the digital world. I also considered factors that are specific in the digital context in driving advantage of foreignness, such as network effect and long-tail users. My study thus advances my understanding of foreignness in the digital context.
This study also contributes to the emerging literature on MNEs’ competitive strategy in the digital world. Previous studies mainly investigate ways to overcome the liability of outsidership (Johanson and Vahlne, 2009), such as by adopting social sharing and virtual community strategies (Shaheer and Li, 2020). The present study shows that maximizing the advantage of foreignness by satisfying the needs of long tail users can also serve as an effective competitive strategy that MNEs adopt to succeed in the digital world. Concentrating on the idea of long tail users, this study considers the ways that MNEs can adopt to maximize their advantage in the digital world, which MNEs can use to increase daily usage time and better compete with local firms.
Research background
Advantage of foreignness
The concept of foreignness has long been central to international business research, initially highlighted by Hymer (1960), who identified the costs associated with it. Subsequently, Zaheer (1995) expanded this notion, introducing the liability of foreignness, which researchers further explored in terms of measurement (Hennart et al., 2002), categorization (Zhou and Guillen, 2016), and its impact on business strategies (Chen, 2006; Mezias, 2002).
While foreignness has often been perceived as a liability, scholars have recognized its potential as an asset (Kostova and Zaheer, 1999; Un, 2011). Foreign firms may possess advantages over local counterparts in various aspects, such as talent recruitment and R&D (Un, 2011; Edman, 2016; Siegel et al., 2019). For instance, Siegel et al. (2019) argued that MNEs can enhance competitiveness and productivity by tapping into excluded talent pools, like women in South Korea. Similarly, Un (2011) found that foreign subsidiaries tend to be more innovative due to support from parent firms and pressure from both the MNE and host country.
A recent review underscores that institutional theory, the resource-based view and transaction cost theory dominate as theoretical frameworks for understanding the advantage of foreignness (Lu et al., 2022). However, scholars have increasingly emphasized demand-side perspectives in exploring key firm strategies like innovation (Zhong et al., 2021) and diversification (Ye et al., 2012), yet such perspectives remain largely unexplored in the study of the advantage of foreignness. Thus, this study seeks to elucidate how MNEs derive advantages from foreignness by considering demand-side factors.
Moreover, the review paper suggests that whether foreignness is perceived as a liability or advantage hinges on specific contextual factors (Lu et al., 2022). The digital world, with its distinct characteristics such as heightened connectivity and reduced physical interactions, represents a unique context worth examining. Integrating these digital-specific features into the study of the advantage of foreignness holds promise for advancing my understanding of foreignness in the digital realm and merits further investigation.
Internationalization in a digital world
With the pervasive trend of digitalization, research on digital applications has surged (Zhu and Liu, 2018; Wen and Zhu, 2020). While scholars have extensively explored strategies concerning mobile apps, such as governance (Zhang et al., 2022) and growth (Agarwal et al., 2023), internationalization in the digital realm has garnered relatively less academic attention. Existing literature predominantly delves into the liability of foreignness or outsidership encountered by MNEs when entering international markets digitally by releasing mobile apps in foreign countries. In this context, Chen et al. (2019) observed that online platform companies grapple with the liability of outsidership due to the limitations of international network effects. Firms can mitigate this liability by targeting countries with significant influence (country clout). Shaheer and Li (2020) investigated factors influencing the internationalization speed of digital innovations through tracking Apple apps. Cultural, administrative, geographic and economic distances emerge as barriers to user adoption, hindering app internationalization. Mobile apps can adopt social sharing and virtual community strategies to alleviate the negative impact of distance on international penetration speed.
While these studies shed light on the challenges MNEs (and their mobile apps) encounter during internationalization and propose solutions to overcome such hurdles in the digital realm, there remain unexplored areas warranting further research. Firstly, prior studies primarily focus on the adverse effects of foreignness when MNEs digitally penetrate foreign markets, particularly in terms of penetration speed (Chen et al., 2019; Shaheer et al., 2020; Shaheer and Li, 2020). Yet, there is a need to explore the advantage of foreignness in the digital domain and consider various dimensions of performance in assessing mobile app internationalization. Secondly, while several strategies to mitigate the liability of outsidership have been proposed, factors related to long tail users have been overlooked. Given the increasing significance of long tail users in the digital sphere (Brynjolfsson et al., 2011), understanding how they influence firm strategy and performance is imperative.
This study seeks to address these research gaps by centering on the advantage of foreignness in a digital world and elucidating how MNEs can leverage this advantage for successful internationalization.
Hypothesis development
Advantage of foreignness in a digital world
I propose that the advantage of foreignness over local firms stems from MNEs capability to cater to the specific needs of long tail users in a digital environment. The term “long tail” refers to the phenomenon where niche products or services collectively constitute a significant portion of total sales (Anderson, 2004). In the digital realm, digitalization facilitates the satisfaction of these long tail users’ needs more easily (Adner et al., 2019; Brynjolfsson et al., 2011). For instance, Brynjolfsson et al. (2011) found that the Internet channel exhibits a less concentrated sales distribution compared to traditional channels, supporting the prevalence of long tail use in the digital world.
In this study, long tail users denote individuals in the host country with needs that can only be met by foreign apps. They may include foreigners or immigrants residing in the host country or locals with experiences in foreign countries or aspirations to travel or live abroad. MNEs hold an advantage over local firms in serving these long tail users in the digital realm for several reasons.
Firstly, long tail users may have accustomed themselves to using foreign apps while residing abroad, thus exhibiting inertia in their app usage behavior. In the digital context, inertia is defined as “user attachment to, and persistence in, using an incumbent system (i.e. status quo), even if there are better alternatives or incentives to change” (Polites and Karahanna, 2012, p. 24). Users tend to develop inertia in using mobile apps. Kim and Kang (2016) argued that users maintain a mobile app due to familiarity with its service content, such as features and functions, to avoid spending extra time and efforts to learn a new one. For example, many Chinese returnees continue to use Google as their primary search engine, despite alternatives available in their home country. Additionally, inertia may arise from switching costs imposed by firms, such as loyalty program benefits, which deter users from switching to alternative apps. For instance, returnees who have attained high-tier status in hotel loyalty programs may continue using those chains’ apps to maintain their benefits, such as free breakfast and lounge access.
Secondly, even if some long tail users may initially prefer local apps, they may be compelled to adopt foreign apps to communicate or connect with individuals in other countries who primarily use foreign apps. This is due to the direct network effect of online platforms, wherein the value of the platform increases as the number of users grows (McIntyre and Srinivasan, 2017; Katz and Shapiro, 1985). For instance, many Chinese people use WhatsApp, a foreign mobile app in China, to communicate with foreigners overseas. Similarly, many overseas Chinese use WeChat, a Chinese mobile app that is considered foreign in the USA, to communicate with their relatives and friends in China.
Thirdly, foreign apps may offer superior products or services in certain markets compared to local alternatives. When users require products or services from foreign countries, foreign apps are often preferred over local ones. For instance, global platforms like Airbnb offer a wider range of accommodation choices for travelers compared to local apps (Guttentag et al., 2018).
These long tail users become an asset for MNEs when internationalizing in the digital world (Burton and Saelens, 1986). The capability to serve long tail users becomes a competitive advantage for foreign apps over local ones. Daily usage time serves as a crucial performance indicator to assess users’ attachment to a specific mobile app (Teo and Lim, 2000; Lee et al., 2016). The advantage of foreign mobile apps can translate into higher average daily usage time than local apps because the products or services they offer to satisfy the needs of long tail users have no substitutes (McLean et al., 2020). For instance, travelers planning holidays abroad may spend considerable time on foreign apps such as Airbnb and Expedia before their trips, resulting in higher daily usage times for these apps compared to local alternatives. I then predict that:
Foreign mobile apps have higher average daily usage time per user than local mobile apps.
Multinational enterprise strategy to maximize advantage of foreignness
In the previous section, I compared the performance of MNEs and local firms in the digital world, highlighting that the advantage of foreignness in this context stems from MNEs’ ability to cater to the specific needs of long tail users in the host country. In this section, I shift my focus to MNEs and examine potential strategies to maximize the advantage of foreignness, particularly in increasing their daily usage time. Given that several strategies are exclusive to MNEs, I solely consider MNEs without comparing them to local firms.
The selection criterion for the variables to be considered is their influence on the extent to which an MNE can benefit from the advantage of foreignness by serving long tail users, which is the proposed mechanism of the main result. Centering around the idea of meeting the needs of long tail users, three variables are considered: the number of potential long tail users in a host country, MNE’s diversity of prior international experience and MNEs’ business model.
The first variable, the number of immigrants from an MNE’s home country in the host country, is linked to the total number of potential long tail users. The greater the number of potential long tail users, the higher the likelihood that an MNE will benefit from the advantage of foreignness. When MNEs enter a foreign country, location choice becomes one of the most crucial dimensions of their internationalization strategy (Cantwell, 2009; Dunning, 1998; Gu et al., 2018), a principle that extends to the digital world (Shaheer et al., 2020). Thus, I first examine location-specific factors influencing the availability of long tail users in a host country.
The second variable, an MNE’s diversity of international experience, reflects its capacity to understand and serve long tail users. Previous international experience is widely acknowledged as a valuable resource upon which MNEs can rely when entering a new country (Guillen, 2003; Johanson and Vahlne, 1977; Soleimani and Yang, 2022). Therefore, I explore how the diversity of an MNE’s prior international experience influences its ability to cater to long tail users.
The third variable, the business model, impacts the degree to which long tail users can generate network effects. Business model plays a critical role in firm strategy (Zott et al., 2011; Cavallo et al., 2020), particularly in the digital realm (Brouthers et al., 2016). Different business models entail varying levels of network effects, which, in turn, affect the extent to which MNEs can benefit from serving long tail users.
Number of potential long tail users
The availability of long tail users in the host country is a crucial determinant of an MNE’s ability to leverage its advantage in the digital world. As the number of long tail users increases, so does the advantage of MNEs over local firms in the digital sphere.
Research suggests that firms tend to internationalize by following their customers (Chou and Shen, 2014; Kabongo and Okpara, 2019). Specifically, ethnic ties established by immigrants play a significant role in driving foreign market entries (Li et al., 2019; Tong, 2005; Chung and Tung, 2013). Immigrants can function as transactional communities, facilitating international business between their countries of residence and origin (Chung and Tung, 2013). For instance, Li et al. (2019) observed that South Korean banks tend to establish a presence in Chinese provinces with substantial South Korean immigrant populations, as these immigrants facilitate transactions between foreign firms and local stakeholders. This phenomenon also holds true in the digital realm. Immigrants from an MNE’s home country constitute many long tail users in the host country. These users either develop inertia and are reluctant to switch mobile apps in the host country, or they need to use foreign mobile apps to communicate with contacts in their home country. In either case, the foreign app remains prevalent when users reside in the host country. For example, Line, a Japanese communication app, emerged as one of the top 10 communication apps in Brazil, where there is a significant population of Japanese immigrants. Similarly, Trip.com, a Chinese online travel agency (OTA), has become one of the top 10 most downloaded OTA apps globally, benefiting from the widespread presence of Chinese immigrants worldwide.
In summary, many immigrants from an MNE’s home country contribute to the advantage of foreignness in the digital world by increasing the number of long tail users in the host country. Therefore, I predict:
The average daily usage time of a foreign mobile increases with the number of immigrants from its owner MNE’s home country in the host country.
Multinational enterprises’ diversity of international experience
The advantage of foreignness is derived from an MNE’s ability to satisfy the specific needs of long tail users. Here, I argue that the diversity of foreign experience accumulated by an MNE affects its advantage of foreignness in a digital world. Firms learn to bridge the gap between their home and host countries by using prior international experience as a guide for future action (Guillen, 2003; Soleimani and Yang, 2022). For example, Zhou and Guillén (2015) argued that the diversity of prior international experience encourages firms to enter new countries.
MNEs’ diversity of internal experience not only refers to the number of foreign countries in which they have invested but also to the diversity in institutional contexts wherein they operate (Barkema and Drogendijk, 2007). The institutional difference between developed countries and emerging markets creates substantial costs if MNEs fail to adapt (Verbeke and Yuan, 2016). The difference in institutional contexts further influences consumer demands and preferences in different countries (Berry et al., 2010). In the context of foreign mobile apps, as the diversity of an MNE’s prior foreign experience increases, their capability to serve the needs of long tail users in the host country also increases. The reason is that diverse foreign experiences expose MNEs to a wide variety of user knowledge. When firms face idiosyncratic consumer demands in a new foreign country, those with diverse foreign experiences are better equipped to satisfy such needs by learning from a large pool of consumer knowledge. The diversity of an MNE’s experience in other countries enhances its ability to serve specific consumer needs in a particular host country. In the study context, diversity of an MNE’s experience thus increases its ability to serve the needs of long tail users.
In addition, as the diverse international experience of the MNE increases, the likelihood that some users have used the mobile app in a foreign country and continue to do so when they move to the host country also increases. In other words, diversity of an MNE’s international experience also increases the possible pool of long tail users in the host country.
In summary, diversity of an MNE’s international experience not only helps it better serve the needs of long tail users but also increases the potential pool of long tail users. I predict that:
The average daily usage time of a foreign mobile app increases with the level of diversity of prior international experience of its owner, MNE.
Multinational enterprises’ business model
The advantage of foreignness in the digital realm also hinges on the chosen business model, defined as “a system of interdependent activities that transcends the focal firm and spans its boundaries” (Zott and Amit, 2010, p. 216) to generate value (McDonald and Eisenhardt, 2020). The advent of the Internet has opened new avenues for creating and delivering value, giving rise to diverse business models (Zott and Amit, 2010). These models vary in their value propositions and rely on different factors for success (Zott et al., 2011).
In the digital domain, many business models depend on the network effect, where the value to users increases with the number of other users in the network (Zhu and Iansiti, 2012). However, the nature of this effect differs across different business models. Some online platforms operate on a one-sided network effect, such as those for online communication (e.g. WhatsApp), while others rely on a two-sided network effect, such as online transactions (e.g. Amazon). Notably, ibusiness firms, which leverage the Internet and computer-based information systems to provide interactive platforms, have emerged as prominent players in the digital landscape (Brouthers et al., 2016). Similar terms include “platform firms” (Stallkamp and Schotter, 2021) or “sharing-economy firms” (Parente et al., 2018). The success of ibusiness firms hinges on the network effects of two-sided markets (Zhu and Iansiti, 2012), where an increase in the user base on one side of the platform enhances the value for users on the other side (Katz and Shapiro, 1985).
Transferring network effects across borders presents a challenge, even in the digital realm. The liability of foreignness manifests in various forms, including heightened communication and transaction costs (Lu et al., 2022; Shin et al., 2022). One of the primary hurdles for ibusiness firms during globalization lies in establishing a sufficiently large user network in foreign markets, given their lack of local embeddedness in these markets’ user communities. Previous research has underscored the difficulty of extending network externalities across borders (Chen et al., 2019). User heterogeneity across countries complicates the replication of successful strategies from the home country to acquire new users abroad (Stallkamp and Schotter, 2021). The absence of a sizable network diminishes the perceived value of foreign ibusiness firms to local users, exacerbating a chicken-and-egg dilemma (Caillaud and Jullien, 2003).
The advantage of foreignness stems from MNEs’ ability to cater to long-tail users in the host country. However, given that the number of long-tail users is typically small, MNEs encounter challenges in capitalizing on the network effect with this user segment. Consequently, as an MNE’s business model increasingly relies on the network effect, the likelihood of leveraging the advantage of foreignness diminishes. Given the heavy reliance of ibusiness firms on the network effect for success, their advantage of foreignness in the digital realm is comparatively weaker. I predict that:
The average daily usage time of foreign mobile apps is shorter for ibusiness firms than for other firms.
Data and method
Previous studies on mobile apps have primarily relied on data from Apple or Google App stores (Chen et al., 2019; Wen and Zhu, 2020). While such data offer comprehensive insights into the number of available apps and downloads, they lack detailed usage information such as the number of active users or average usage time. To address these limitations, I leverage unique proprietary data from one of China’s largest mobile phone manufacturers, a global player with significant sales in numerous countries, with over 70% of its sales originating from overseas markets.
Context
To investigate the advantage of foreignness in mobile apps, I focus on the travel category for several reasons. Firstly, this category is likely to involve significant contributions from long tail users, given the highly personalized and diverse demands associated with travel experiences (Lew, 2008). Secondly, the travel category in China boasts a substantial presence of foreign mobile apps, despite the dominance of local apps in other categories (Thomala, 2020). This prevalence of foreign apps is attributed to the increasing number of Chinese travelers exploring international destinations for tourism and business. Thirdly, the travel category encompasses a diverse array of firms with varying business models, including traditional hotel chains such as Hilton and Marriot, and online platforms like Airbnb and Booking, enabling us to examine the role of business models in the advantage of foreignness.
Sample
I begin by identifying all foreign mobile apps in the “travel and transportation” category within the app store, totaling 1,993 apps, predominantly focused on local transportation. Among these, I discern 11 foreign apps originating from six different countries, classified into three types: traditional hotel chains, online platform apps (divided into business-to-customer (B2C) and customer-to-customer (C2C) segments) and online search engines. Subsequently, I select local apps of analogous types, employing two research assistants to identify similar local apps within the travel category. Apps that do not directly compete with foreign counterparts are excluded, while prominent middle- and high-end hotel chains with a substantial presence across China are included. The high consistency (Cohen’s Kappa coefficient = 0.96) between raters underscores the reliability of the categorization process. In instances of disagreement, the author adjudicates based on available data. The final sample comprises 32 apps, including 11 foreign and 21 local mobile apps of comparable types. Table 1 shows the name, country and type of the 32 mobile apps.
Daily usage data for these 32 mobile apps in the travel category were sourced from the mobile phone manufacturer, spanning September 24, 2019, to May 31, 2020. This proprietary data is augmented with variables obtained from publicly accessible sources, including the mobile manufacturer’s app store, a reputable third-party information provider, Qi Mai Data [1] and data published by the World Health Organization to account for the COVID-19 pandemic.
Variables
Dependent variables.
The daily usage time is the average use time (in minutes) of each active user in a day. Active users are those who use the app on a particular day.
Independent variables
To test H1, I set foreign as a dummy variable that equals one if a mobile app is provided by a foreign firm and zero otherwise.
To test H2, I measure the number of long tail users by immigrant, defined as the natural logarithm of immigrants in China from an MNE’s home country in 2019. The data are published by the National Bureau of Statistics in China.
To test H3, I measure the diversity of international experience, which is the natural logarithm of the number of countries where an MNE operates by the end of 2019. This variable is the number of countries in which a hotel chain has accommodations, or for online platforms, the number of countries in which the MNE operates. A high value indicates high diversity of experience.
To test H4, I use a dummy variable ibusiness to measure whether a mobile app belongs to an ibusiness firm or not. Both B2C and C2C platforms are identified as ibusiness firms, which rely on two-sided network effects.
Control variables
I include a list of control variables at different levels. The first set is at the mobile app level, including user rating and app size. User rating is the average score received by a mobile app that reflects its perceived quality. As the perceived quality increases, the likelihood that users use the app also increases. App size is the total size of the mobile app. A large size can imply more functions, which can increase the time a user spends on the app.
The second set of control variables concerns time. Users may install and use a newly updated mobile app. Therefore, I control for this effect by update time, which is the number of days since a mobile app’s latest update. Usage time is also influenced by proximity to a long holiday (more than two consecutive days), when people tend to travel. I control for this effect by using time to holiday, which is the number of days left to the next long public holiday. People also have extra time to spend on their mobile phones on holidays. I control for this effect using a dummy variable rest, which equals one for Saturday or Sunday and zero otherwise. The COVID-19 pandemic creates a huge environmental shock for all businesses worldwide (Donthu and Gustafsson, 2020; Van Assche and Lundan, 2020), but more so for the travel category. The pandemic outbreak prevents people from moving around both domestically and internationally. I measure the effect of COVID-19 by infected number, which is the number of newly confirmed cases in China in a day.
Cross-national distance also matters in the international penetration of mobile apps (Shaheer and Li, 2020). Following literature (Berry et al., 2010), I measure cross-national distance as the Mahalanobis distance in nine dimensions between a mobile app’s home country and China, including economic, financial, political, administrative, cultural, demographic, knowledge, global connectedness and geographic distance. Different distance dimensions are standardized, and then an average value as cross-national distance is computed. Home country dummies are also controlled for to avoid other potential home country effects.
Model
The unit of analysis is the mobile app-day, yielding a panel data structure. Fixed effect estimation may be preferred to mitigate biases due to unobserved factors that vary across mobile apps and may influence usage. However, this estimation appears infeasible in my context, given that the sample has a relatively short time span (251 days) and several key variables, such as my independent variable, remain constant. Therefore, the random effect model estimations are used in my main analyses. Stata command xtreg with random effect is used to run the regressions.
Results
Tables 2 and 3 present the means, standard deviations and correlations for the variables used in the regressions, encompassing the full sample and the subsample of foreign mobile apps, respectively. I use the full sample to test H1 and the subsample of MNEs to test H2–H4. All correlations between independent and control variables are below 0.50, indicating no significant multicollinearity issues. Additionally, the variance inflation factor (VIF) of each regression model is examined, with an average VIF of 3.11, well below the threshold of 10, indicating no severe multicollinearity concerns.
Table 4 lists the main regression results in six models. The dependent variable of the models is daily active user. Models 1 and 2 use the full sample, and Models 3–6 use the subsample of foreign mobile apps. Models 1 and 3 are the baselines, which include only control variables. In Model 1, app size is positive and significant, suggesting that users spend more time on large apps. Rest and infected number are negative and significant, showing that users are less likely to spend considerable time on travel mobile apps during nonworking days when the number of potential COVID-19 infected people is high. In Model 3, app size and infected number remain significant and with the same sign. User rating is positive and significant, which means that users spend greater time on foreign apps with a high level of quality. Update time and time to holiday are negative and significant, which implies that users are likely to spend more time on a foreign app that is newly updated and when a holiday is near. Distance is negative and significant, indicating that users spend less time on foreign mobile apps from distant countries.
In Model 2, the independent variable foreign is added. and the results show that the coefficient is positive and significant (β = 9.64; p < 0.000). Thus, foreign mobile apps have longer daily usage time than local ones. Therefore, H1 is supported. Using parameters in Model 2 and holding all other variables constant, users spend 9.64 min longer on foreign apps than on local ones each day.
Models 3–6 focus on foreign mobile apps. In Model 3, I add the independent variable immigrants, which is positive and significant (β = 2.03; p < 0.000). One unit increase in the log number of immigrants can increase daily usage time by 2.03 min. Therefore, H2 is supported. In Model 4, I add the independent variable diversity of experience, which is positive and significant (β = 0.10; p = 0.007). One unit increase in the log number of diversity of experience can increase daily usage time by 0.10 min. Therefore, H3 is supported. In Model 5, I add the independent variable ibusiness, which is negative and significant (β = −5.64; p < 0.000). The average daily usage time of foreign ibusiness firms’ mobile apps is 5.64 min shorter than that of other types of firms. Therefore, H4 is also supported. Model 6 is the full model. All three independent variables remain significant with the same sign.
Robustness checks
The robustness of the results is assessed through various model specifications, as outlined in Table 5. Due to space constraints, only the full model is reported. First, instead of using random-effect panel analysis, I used pooled ordinary least square regression clustered by mobile apps. Models 1 and 2 summarize the results. Second, I use the generalized least square regression model, and the results are summarized in Models 3 and 4. Next, the global pandemic in 2020 can lead to bias in my results, given that global travel is heavily influenced by COVID-19. I then restrict my sample to the pre-pandemic period, which is before Jan. 11, 2020, when China first started to publicly report the number of infected people. Models 5 and 6 summarize the results. The reference models for these robustness checks are Models 2 and 6 of Table 4, which are consistent with those in Table 5. Overall, the key empirical results are robust across different model specifications and time periods.
Discussion and conclusion
This study delves into the advantage of foreignness in the digital realm, particularly focusing on mobile apps. My findings reveal that foreign mobile apps tend to attract more usage from long tail users compared to local apps, indicating a distinct advantage. Furthermore, I uncover how MNEs can optimize this advantage by strategically leveraging factors such as the presence of immigrants from their home country, diverse international experience and judicious selection of business models.
My research contributes to existing literature in several ways. Firstly, I extend the concept of the advantage of foreignness to the digital domain, shedding light on a novel mechanism through which foreign firms gain competitive leverage (Chen et al., 2019; Shaheer et al., 2020). While prior studies primarily focused on traditional firms (Edman, 2016; Nachum, 2010), I highlight the significance of demand-side factors in driving the advantage of foreignness in the digital sphere. I argue that the ability to serve the needs of long tail users is the key advantage of MNEs over local firms in a digital world. We further examine three variables related to the extent to which an MNE could benefit from satisfying the needs of long tail users. This study thus advances my understanding of advantage of foreignness.
Secondly, my study enriches our understanding of MNEs’ internationalization in the digital age. Contrary to the prevailing notion that MNEs face challenges due to the liability of foreignness (Chen et al., 2019; Shaheer et al., 2020), I demonstrate that there are indeed advantages to be gained in the digital realm. The results show that the performance implication of foreignness in the digital world is indeed complex, and I need to be specific about which dimension of performance to focus on. By offering a balanced view of the performance implications of foreignness, I provide valuable insights for navigating digital globalization.
Thirdly, I contribute to the literature on competitive strategy in the digital landscape. While previous research often centered on mitigating the negative effects of foreignness (Chen et al., 2019; Shaheer et al., 2020), my study emphasizes the importance of maximizing the advantages available to MNEs. Through location selection, diverse international experience and strategic business model choices, MNEs can effectively capitalize on their foreignness in the digital arena. This study therefore also helps us better understand the competitive strategy of MNEs in a digital world.
Additionally, my findings have implications for ibusiness firms, highlighting the unique challenges they face in global expansion (Brouthers et al., 2016). The success of ibusiness firms depends on the direct and indirect network effects of two-sided markets. My findings suggest that the globalization of ibusiness firms is even harder than that of other MNEs due to the difficulty of generating network effect by long tail users in a foreign country.
Apart from its contributions to academic literature, this study presents important practical implications. Managers of foreign mobile apps should be aware of and prepared to overcome difficulties in attempting to internationalize in a digital world. Moreover, they must also acknowledge the benefits of being foreign in such context and capitalize on their valuable long tail users in a host country. For example, additional value may be extracted from their existing users by providing extra services or products. Moreover, the internationalization strategy can be carefully selected to maximize their advantage of foreignness. Managers can select appropriate location and business model to better serve long tail users. Moreover, learning from their diverse knowledge on users in different countries can also help them increase customer loyalty in the host country. From the perspective of local mobile apps, managers need to be prepared when foreign apps enter the market. Despite their certain benefits as local firms, local firms must pay attention to the needs of long tail users to better compete with foreign apps.
This study also has policy implications. For policymakers in the host country, they should be aware of the advantage of foreignness in the digital world. They could help domestic firms to compete with MNEs by focusing on the needs of long tail users. For example, the government could gather information on the demands of long tail users and share it with domestic firms so that they could better serve these customers. Likewise, policymakers in the home country could help its country’s MNEs internationalize by connecting them with long tail users in foreign countries. For example, the government could organize activities for immigrants in foreign countries to interact with MNEs from the home country.
Nevertheless, this study has a few inherent limitations that provide opportunities for future research. First, my sample is derived from only one category, that is, travel. Although this is a common practice in the study of mobile apps to focus on one specific category (Chen et al., 2019; Shaheer and Li, 2020), the generalizability of the findings is thereby limited. I call for future studies to explore new data that allow a larger sample with multiple categories to help confirm the robustness of the findings for my arguments and hypotheses.
Second, I focus on a sample of mobile app users in only one host country, namely, China. Although the arguments and hypotheses are not country-specific, China has unique characteristics, such as diverse consumer demands. Future studies must exercise caution when attempting to generalize the findings to other contexts. Further research can explore mobile apps from multiple host countries.
Although attempts have been exerted to attain comprehensiveness and include several control variables, other motivations may exist for the user adoption of mobile apps, which I cannot control in my data. For example, users may adopt a mobile app owing to its certain features. To overcome the lack of information, future studies may consider using primary data, such as surveys or interviews, rather than secondary data to provide better control for other key drivers of user adoption of mobile apps.
This study significantly contributes to the literature on the performance implications of foreignness in the digital realm by empirically examining the advantages enjoyed by foreign mobile apps compared to local ones. By highlighting the potential benefits of foreignness and elucidating strategies for MNEs to maximize such advantages, my research enriches my understanding of globalization dynamics and competitive strategies in the digital age. Consequently, my study serves as a catalyst for further exploration in this area, presenting ample opportunities for ongoing investigations to delve deeper into the complexities of digital globalization and its implications for MNEs.
List of app name, country and type
Name | Country | Type |
---|---|---|
Accor | France | Hotel chain |
Agoda | Singapore | B2C |
Airbnb | USA | C2C |
Atour | China | Hotel chain |
Booking | Netherlands | B2C |
Ctrip | China | B2C |
Dossen | China | Hotel chain |
Elong | China | B2C |
Fliggy | China | B2C |
Green tree | China | Hotel chain |
Hilton | USA | Hotel chain |
Home Inn | China | Hotel chain |
Huazhu | China | Hotel chain |
Hyatt | USA | Hotel chain |
iGola | China | Search |
IHG | UK | Hotel chain |
Mafengwo | China | C2C |
Marriot | USA | Hotel chain |
Meituan Minsu | China | C2C |
OYO | India | Hotel chain |
Podinns | China | Hotel chain |
Qunar | China | B2C |
Qyer | China | B2C |
Shangri-la | China | Hotel chain |
Skyscanner | UK | Search |
Tongcheng | China | B2C |
TripAdvisor | USA | C2C |
Tujia | China | C2C |
Tuniu | China | B2C |
Wehotel | China | Hotel chain |
WYN88 | China | Hotel chain |
Xiaozhu | China | C2C |
Source: Author’s own work
Descriptive statistics and correlation matrix (full sample)
No. | Variable | Mean | S.D. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Daily usage time | 4.99 | 2.56 | 1.00 | ||||||||
2 | Foreign | 0.33 | 0.47 | 0.14 | 1.00 | |||||||
3 | User rating | 55.16 | 22.79 | 0.32 | 0.02 | 1.00 | ||||||
4 | App size | 18.22 | 22.76 | 0.19 | 0.25 | −0.06 | 1.00 | |||||
5 | Update time | 0.33 | 0.47 | −0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 1.00 | ||||
6 | Time to holiday | 14.88 | 12.66 | −0.01 | −0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 1.00 | |||
7 | Rest | 4.27 | 0.54 | 0.12 | −0.33 | −0.13 | −0.16 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 1.00 | ||
8 | Infected number | 407.51 | 1,311.81 | −0.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.00 | −0.20 | −0.01 | 1.00 | |
9 | Distance | 0.60 | 0.85 | 0.16 | 0.49 | 0.02 | 0.22 | −0.02 | −0.01 | −0.25 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
N = 6,233. Pearson correlations, two–tailed. Correlations with an absolute value >0.03 are significant at the 0.01 level of confidence
Source: Author’s own work
Descriptive statistics and correlation matrix (foreign mobile apps only)
No. | Variable | Mean | S.D. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Daily usage time | 5.49 | 3.19 | 1.00 | ||||||||||
2 | Immigrants | 0.37 | 1.02 | 0.06 | 1.00 | |||||||||
3 | Diversity of experience | 3.14 | 1.73 | 0.15 | −0.45 | 1.00 | ||||||||
4 | ibusiness | 0.46 | 0.50 | −0.45 | 0.13 | 0.34 | 1.00 | |||||||
5 | User rating | 55.65 | 22.94 | 0.55 | −0.11 | −0.37 | −0.28 | 1.00 | ||||||
6 | App size | 26.32 | 31.81 | −0.28 | 0.14 | 0.00 | −0.03 | −0.04 | 1.00 | |||||
7 | Update time | 0.33 | 0.47 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 1.00 | ||||
8 | Time to holiday | 14.61 | 12.48 | 0.03 | −0.02 | −0.04 | −0.03 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 1.00 | |||
9 | Rest | 4.02 | 0.75 | 0.31 | −0.25 | −0.01 | −0.78 | −0.13 | −0.13 | −0.01 | 0.03 | 1.00 | ||
10 | Infected number | 406.87 | 1,311.30 | −0.08 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.00 | −0.19 | −0.03 | 1.00 | |
11 | Distance | 0.79 | 1.19 | 0.28 | −0.41 | 0.02 | −0.40 | 0.06 | −0.25 | −0.22 | 0.06 | 0.27 | −0.05 | 1.00 |
N = 2,077. Pearson correlations, two-tailed. Correlations with an absolute value > 0.04 are significant at the 0.01 level of confidence
Source: Author’s own work
Coefficients of random-effect panel regression predicting daily usage time
Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Independent variables | ||||||
Foreign | 9.64 (2.19) [0.000] |
|||||
Immigrants | 2.03 (0.12) [0.000] |
0.76 (0.22) [0.000] |
||||
Diversity of experience | 0.10 (0.04) [0.007] |
0.29 (0.04) [0.000] |
||||
ibusiness | −5.64 (0.38) [0.000] |
−6.64 (0.000) [0.000] |
||||
Control variables | ||||||
User rating | 1.05 (0.77) [0.171] |
0.95 (0.79) [0.230] |
1.52 (0.10) [0.000] |
1.34 (0.12) [0.000] |
5.94 (0.31) [0.000] |
6.17 (0.30) [0.000] |
App size | 0.02 (0.00) [0.000] |
0.02 (0.00) [0.000] |
0.06 (0.00) [0.000] |
0.05 (0.01) [0.000] |
0.14 (0.01) [0.000] |
0.12 (0.01) [0.000] |
Update time | −0.01 (0.00) [0.191] |
−0.01 (0.00) [0.000] |
−0.01 (0.00) [0.000] |
−0.01 (0.00) [0.000] |
−0.01 (0.00) [0.000] |
−0.01 (0.00) [0.000] |
Time to holiday | −0.00 (0.00) [0.191] |
−0.00 (0.00) [0.255] |
−0.00 (0.00) [0.000] |
−0.00 (0.00) [0.000] |
−0.01 (0.00) [0.001] |
−0.01 (0.00) [0.003] |
Rest | −0.15 (0.03) [0.000] |
−0.19 (0.04) [0.000] |
−0.14 (0.07) [0.062] |
−0.14 (0.07) [0.063] |
−0.20 (0.07) [0.006] |
−0.20 (0.07) [0.003] |
Infected number × 10–3 | −0.25 (0.01) [0.000] |
−0.25 (0.01) [0.000] |
−0.17 (0.00) [0.000] |
−0.17 (0.00) [0.000] |
−0.19 (0.00) [0.000] |
−0.20 (0.00) [0.000] |
Distance | −0.30 (0.49) [0.542] |
−1.01 (0.57) [0.075] |
−2.39 (0.35) [0.000] |
−2.38 (0.35) [0.000] |
−3.09 (0.34) [0.000] |
−3.20 (0.33) [0.000] |
Home country dummies | Included | Included | Included | Included | Included | Included |
Constant | 0.98 (0.25) [0.000] |
−0.25 (3.52) [0.943] |
−4.52 (0.70) [0.000] |
−1.88 (1.11) [0.090] |
−32.94 (2.03) [0.000] |
−31.40 (1.98) [0.000] |
Number of observations | 6,223 | 6,223 | 2,077 | 2,077 | 2,077 | 2,077 |
Wald’s chi-squared | 673.16 | 694.16 | n.a. | 8,004.30 | 9,067.66 | n.a |
R-square (between) | 0.31 | 0.55 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
Model significance | 0.000 | 0.000 | n.a. | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Two-tailed tests. Standard errors are in parentheses. p values are in brackets
Source: Author’s own work
Robustness checks
Model specification | Pooled OLS | GLS | Pre-pandemic period | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 |
Independent variable | ||||||
Foreign | 8.50 (1.01) [0.000] |
8.19 (0.67) [0.000] |
6.75 (2.28) [0.003] |
|||
Immigrants | 6.63 (1.90) [0.007] |
1.68 (0.43) [0.000] |
1.00 (0.39) [0.011] |
|||
Diversity of experience | 0.29 (0.14) [0.047] |
0.36 (0.08) [0.000] |
0.47 (0.03) [0.000] |
|||
ibusiness | −6.64 (2.02) [0.009] |
−5.66 (0.80) [0.000] |
−5.58 (0.76) [0.000] |
|||
Control variables | ||||||
User rating | 0.40 (0.87) [0.649] |
6.17 [1.97] [0.012] |
0.69 (0.16) [0.000] |
5.51 (0.62) [0.000] |
0.92 (0.82) [0.261] |
4.77 (0.66) [0.000] |
App size | 0.02 (0.01) [0.166] |
0.12 (0.05) [0.050] |
0.02 (0.00) [0.000] |
0.09 (0.01) [0.000] |
0.03 (0.00) [0.000] |
0.08 (0.01) [0.000] |
Update time | −0.01 (0.01) [0.071] |
−0.01 (0.01) [0.361] |
−0.00 (0.00) [0.032] |
−0.01 (0.00) [0.001] |
−0.00 (0.00) [0.062] |
−0.00 (0.00) [0.000] |
Time to holiday | −0.00 (0.01) [0.606] |
−0.01 (0.01) [0.481] |
−0.00 (0.00) [0.353] |
−0.01 (0.00) [0.089] |
−0.00 (0.00) [0.029] |
−0.01 (0.00) [0.000] |
Rest | −0.06 (0.12) [0.626] |
−0.20 (0.13) [0.155] |
−0.06 (0.02) [0.001] |
−0.11 (0.06) [0.050] |
−0.14 (0.04) [0.000] |
0.44 (0.08) [0.000] |
Infected number × 10–3 | −0.26 (0.00) [0.000] |
−0.20 (0.02) [0.003] |
−0.02 (0.00) [0.025] |
−0.04 (0.02) [0.023] |
/ | / |
Distance | −3.44 (2.89) [0.243] |
−3.20 (0.62) [0.001] |
−0.17 (0.29) [0.543] |
−1.32 (0.46) [0.004] |
−0.96 (0.62) [0.125] |
−5.15 (0.46) [0.00] |
Home country dummies | Included | Included | Included | Included | Included | Included |
Constant | 2.35 (4.08) [0.569] |
−31.40 (14.43) [0.058] |
0.88 (0.76) [0.248] |
−22.32 (3.84) [0.000] |
−0.17 (3.67) [0.963] |
−25.36 (4.44) [0.000] |
Number of observations | 6,223 | 2,077 | 6,223 | 2,077 | 2,020 | 703 |
Wald’s chi-squared | / | / | 698.05 | 1,975.31 | n.a. | n.a. |
R-square | 0.45 | 0.82 | / | / | 0.41 | 0.99 |
Two-tailed tests. Standard errors are in parentheses. p values are in brackets
Source: Author’s own work
Note
Website of the Qi Mai Data: https://www.qimai.cn/
References
Adner, R., Puranam, P. and Zhu, F. (2019), “What is different about digital strategy? From quantitative to qualitative change”, Strategy Science, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 253-261.
Agarwal, S., Miller, C.D. and Ganco, M. (2023), “Growing platforms within platforms: how platforms manage the adoption of complementor products in the presence of network effects?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 44 No. 8, pp. 1879-1910.
Anderson, C. (2004), “The long tail”, Wired Magazine, pp. 170-177.
Barkema, H.G. and Drogendijk, R. (2007), “Internationalising in small, incremental or larger steps?”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 38 No. 7, pp. 1132-1148.
Berry, H., Guillen, M.F. and Zhou, N. (2010), “An institutional approach to cross-national distance”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 41 No. 9, pp. 1460-1480.
Boudreau, K.J. and Jeppesen, L.B. (2015), “Unpaid crowd complementors: the platform network effect mirage”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 36 No. 12, pp. 1761-1777.
Brouthers, K.D., Geisser, K.D. and Rothlauf, F. (2016), “Explaining the internationalization of ibusiness firms”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 47 No. 5, pp. 513-534.
Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, Y. and Simester, D. (2011), “Goodbye Pareto principle, hello long tail: the effect of search costs on the concentration of product sales”, Management Science, Vol. 57 No. 8, pp. 1373-1386.
Burton, F.N. and Saelens, F.H. (1986), “The European investments of Japanese financial institutions”, Columbia Journal of World Business, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 27-33.
Caillaud, B. and Jullien, B. (2003), “Chicken and egg: competition among intermediation service providers”, The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 309-328.
Calhoun, M.A. (2002), “Unpacking liability of foreignness: identifying culturally driven external and internal sources of liability for the foreign subsidiary”, Journal of International Management, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 301-321.
Cantwell, J. (2009), “Location and the multinational enterprise”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 35-41.
Cavallo, A., Ghezzi, A. and Ruales Guzmán, B.V. (2020), “Driving internationalization through business model innovation: evidences from an AgTech company”, Multinational Business Review, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 201-220.
Chen, T.-J. (2006), “Liability of foreignness and entry mode choice: Taiwanese firms in Europe”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 59 No. 2, pp. 288-294.
Chen, Y.-R.R. (2007), “The strategic management of government affairs in China: how multinational corporations in China interact with the Chinese government”, Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 283-306.
Chen, L., Shaheer, N., Yi, J. and Li, S. (2019), “The international penetration of ibusiness firms: network effects, liabilities of outsidership and country clout”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 172-192.
Chou, H.-H. and Shen, C.-H. (2014), “Foreign bank expansion and the follow-the-customer hypothesis”, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Vol. 25-26no, pp. 95-109.
Chung, H.F.L. and Tung, R.L. (2013), “Immigrant social networks and foreign entry: Australia and New Zealand firms in the European Union and greater China”, International Business Review, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 18-31.
Donthu, N. and Gustafsson, A. (2020), “Effects of Covid-19 on business and research”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 117, pp. 284-289.
Dunning, J.H. (1998), “Location and the multinational enterprise: a neglected factor?”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 45-66.
Edman, J. (2016), “Reconciling the advantages and liabilities of foreignness: towards an identity-based framework”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 47 No. 6, pp. 674-694.
Eisenmann, T., Parker, G. and Van Alstyne, M. (2011), “Platform envelopment”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 32 No. 12, pp. 1270-1285.
Ghose, A. and Han, S.P. (2014), “Estimating demand for mobile applications in the new economy”, Management Science, Vol. 60 No. 6, pp. 1470-1488.
Gu, J., Yang, Y. and Strange, R. (2018), “Location choice, ownership structure and multinational performance”, Multinational Business Review, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 250-276.
Guillen, M.F. (2003), “Experience, imitation, and the sequence of foreign entry: wholly owned and joint-venture manufacturing by South Korean firms and business groups in China, 1987-1995”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 185-198.
Guttentag, D., Smith, S., Potwarka, L. and Havitz, M. (2018), “Why tourists choose Airbnb: a motivation-based segmentation study”, Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 57 No. 3, pp. 342-359.
Hennart, J.-F., Roehl, T. and Zeng, M. (2002), “Do exits proxy a liability of foreignness?: the case of Japanese exits from the US”, Journal of International Management, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 241-264.
Hymer, S.H. (1960), The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.-E. (1977), “The internationalization process of the firm – a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 25-34.
Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.-E. (2009), “The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: from liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 40 No. 9, pp. 1411-1431.
Kabongo, J.D. and Okpara, J.O. (2019), “Timing and speed of internationalization: evidence from African banks”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 102no, pp. 12-20.
Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C.C. (1985), “Network externalities, competition, and compatibility”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 75 No. 3, pp. 424-440.
Kim, B. and Kang, M. (2016), “How user loyalty and nonconscious inertia influence the continued use of mobile communications platforms”, International Journal of Mobile Communications, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 387-410.
Kostova, T. and Zaheer, S. (1999), “Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: the case of the multinational enterprise”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 64-81.
Lee, A.R., Son, S.-M. and Kim, K.K. (2016), “Information and communication technology overload and social networking service fatigue: a stress perspective”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 55no, pp. 51-61.
Lew, A. (2008), “Long tail tourism: New geographies for marketing niche tourism products”, Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, Vol. 25 Nos 3/4, pp. 409-419.
Li, Y., Hernandez, E. and Gwon, S. (2019), “When do ethnic communities affect foreign location choice? Dual entry strategies of Korean banks in China”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 62 No. 1, pp. 172-195.
Lu, J.W., Ma, H. and Xie, X. (2022), “Foreignness research in international business: major streams and future directions”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 53 No. 3, pp. 449-480.
McDonald, R.M. and Eisenhardt, K.M. (2020), “Parallel play: startups, nascent markets, and effective business-model design”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 483-523.
McIntyre, D.P. and Srinivasan, A. (2017), “Networks, platforms, and strategy: emerging views and next steps”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 141-160.
McLean, G., Osei-Frimpong, K., Al-Nabhani, K. and Marriott, H. (2020), “Examining consumer attitudes towards retailers' m-commerce mobile applications – an initial adoption vs. continuous use perspective”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 106, pp. 139-157.
Mezias, J.M. (2002), “How to identify liabilities of foreignness and assess their effects on multinational corporations”, Journal of International Management, Vol. 8 No. 3, p. 265.
Nachum, L. (2010), “When is foreignness an asset or a liability? Explaining the performance differential between foreign and local firms”, Journal of Management, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 714-739.
Parente, R.C., Geleilate, J.-M.G. and Rong, K. (2018), “The sharing economy globalization phenomenon: a research agenda”, Journal of International Management, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 52-64.
Polites, G.L. and Karahanna, E. (2012), “Shackled to the status quo: the inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 21-42.
Scott-Kennel, J., Giroud, A. and Saittakari, I. (2022), “Foreign and domestic multinationals' linkages in advanced, small open economies: do foreignness, regional origin and technological capability matter?”, Multinational Business Review, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 573-598.
Shaheer, N., Li, S. and Priem, R. (2020), “Revisiting location in a digital age: how can lead markets accelerate the internationalization of mobile apps?”, Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 21-40.
Shaheer, N.A. and Li, S. (2020), “The cage around cyberspace? How digital innovations internationalize in a virtual world”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 35 No. 1, p. 105892.
Shin, H.W., Lee, S.-H. and Lee, M.-J. (2022), “Impact of the liability of foreignness, domicile of incorporation and an institutional change on reverse merger firms’ capital-raising performance”, Multinational Business Review, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 81-102.
Siegel, J., Pyun, L. and Cheon, B.Y. (2019), “Multinational firms, labor market discrimination, and the capture of outsider’s advantage by exploiting the social divide”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 64 No. 2, pp. 370-397.
Soleimani, A. and Yang, K.M. (2022), “Overcoming institutional challenges in cross-border acquisitions: How home- and host-country acquisition experiences shorten the deal completion phase”, Multinational Business Review, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 410-433.
Stallkamp, M. and Schotter, A.P.J. (2021), “Platforms without borders? The international strategies of digital platform firms”, Global Strategy Journal, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 58-80.
Strange, R. and Zucchella, A. (2017), “Industry 4.0, global value chains and international business”, Multinational Business Review, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 174-184.
Teo, T.S.H. and Lim, V.K.G. (2000), “Gender differences in internet usage and task preferences”, Behaviour and Information Technology, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 283-295.
Thomala, L.L. (2020), “Leading apps by monthly active users in China 2020”, available at: www.statista.com/statistics/1032630/china-leading-apps-by-monthly-activeusers/
Tong, S.Y. (2005), “Ethnic networks in FDI and the impact of institutional development”, Review of Development Economics, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 563-580.
Un, C.A. (2011), “The advantage of foreignness in innovation”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 32 No. 11, pp. 1232-1242.
Van Assche, A. and Lundan, S. (2020), “From the editor: COVID-19 and international business policy”, Journal of International Business Policy, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 273-279.
Verbeke, A. and Yuan, W. (2016), “The impact of ‘distance’ on multinational enterprise subsidiary capabilities”, Multinational Business Review, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 168-190.
Wen, W. and Zhu, F. (2020), “Threat of platform-owner entry and complementor responses: evidence from the mobile app market”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 40 No. 9, pp. 1336-1367.
Ye, G., Priem, R.L. and Alshwer, A.A. (2012), “Achieving demand-side synergy from strategic diversification: how combining mundane assets can leverage consumer utilities”, Organization Science, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 207-224.
Zaheer, S. (1995), “Overcoming the liability of foreignness”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 341-363.
Zeng, J., Khan, Z. and De Silva, M. (2019), “The emergence of multi-sided platform MNEs: Internalization theory and networks”, International Business Review, Vol. 28 No. 6, p. 101598.
Zhang, Y., Li, J. and Tong, T.W. (2022), “Platform governance matters: how platform gatekeeping affects knowledge sharing among complementors”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 599-626.
Zhong, W., Ma, Z., Tong, T.W., Zhang, Y. and Xie, L. (2021), “Customer concentration, executive attention, and firm search behavior”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 64 No. 5, pp. 1625-1647.
Zhou, N. and Guillén, M.F. (2015), “From home country to home base: a dynamic approach to the liability of foreignness”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 907-917.
Zhou, N. and Guillen, M.F. (2016), “Categorizing the liability of foreignness: ownership, location, and internalization-specific dimensions”, Global Strategy Journal, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 309-329.
Zhu, F. and Iansiti, M. (2012), “Entry into platform-based markets”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 88-106.
Zhu, F. and Liu, Q. (2018), “Competing with complementors: an empirical look at Amazon.com”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 10, pp. 2618-2642.
Zott, C., Amit, R. and Massa, L. (2011), “The business model: recent developments and future research”, Journal of Management, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 1019-1042.
Zott, C. and Amit, R. (2010), “Business model design: an activity system perspective”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 43 No. 2-3, pp. 216-226.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Numbers: 72122016, 71902091).