To read this content please select one of the options below:

Managing for performance: Measurement and monitoring of contracts in the transit industry

Olga Smirnova (MPA Department of Political Science, East Carolina University.)
Juita-Elena (Wie) Yusuf (School of Public Service, Old Dominion University.)
Suzanne Leland (Department of Political Science and Public Administration, University of North Carolina at Charlotte.)

Journal of Public Procurement

ISSN: 1535-0118

Article publication date: 1 March 2016

259

Abstract

Public agencies contract out to pursue a variety of goals. But, these goals cannot be realized if the performance of contractors is not assessed and monitored. This study examines the state of performance measurement and contract monitoring in the U.S. transit agencies. We focus on three research questions: (1) What monitoring capacity exists within transit agencies? (2) What monitoring methods are used by transit agencies? (3) What performance measures are tracked by transit agencies? We find monitoring units are common in a third of agencies in the study. Service and customer complaints are the most common performance measures, while penalties and liquidated damages are the most frequent form of penalties. Finally, we find that transit agencies utilize a variety of output and outcome measures to monitor contractors.

Citation

Smirnova, O., Yusuf, J.-E.(W). and Leland, S. (2016), "Managing for performance: Measurement and monitoring of contracts in the transit industry", Journal of Public Procurement, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 208-242. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-16-02-2016-B003

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016 by PrAcademics Press

Related articles