The implications of a muddled definition of public procurement

Abstract

At all levels of government, inconsistencies exist regarding the terminology and the body of knowledge used to understand public procurement. Perspectives on what public procurement is, or should be, ranges from routine ordering to sophisticated analysis of government spending. Definitional ambiguities have hampered attempts to define the field and unify its focus. This exploratory article examines the implications of the muddled nature of public procurement that has led to debate and uncertainty about the proper role of public procurement practitioners. To address these limitations, three dimensions of all public procurement systems are identified, and a general definition is proposed for describing the field and its institutionalized practices.

Citation

Prier, E. and McCue, C.P. (2009), "The implications of a muddled definition of public procurement", Journal of Public Procurement, Vol. 9 No. 3/4, pp. 326-370. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-09-03-04-2009-B002