To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

Does the integration of response services lead to meaningful change in healthcare activity? A case study evaluation

Sebastian Hinde (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK)
Jo Setters (York Health Economics Consortium, York, UK)
Laura Bojke (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK)
Nick Hex (York Health Economics Consortium, York, UK)
Gerry Richardson (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK)

Journal of Integrated Care

ISSN: 1476-9018

Article publication date: 18 June 2019

Issue publication date: 22 July 2019

268

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the NHS England Vanguards of new care models was to improve healthcare provision and integration through the coordination of services, seeking to deliver the Five Year Forward View. The purpose of this paper is to report on an extensive analysis of one of the Vanguard programmes, exploring whether the implemented integrated response service (IRS) based in Harrogate, England, resulted in any meaningful change in secondary healthcare activity.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors used an interrupted time series framework applied to aggregate secondary care data, specifically emergency attendances for patients 65+, emergency bed days for all adults and non-elective admissions for 65+. Synthetic and geographic comparator data were employed to inform additional scenario analyses.

Findings

The majority of the analyses conducted found no statistically significant effect of the IRS team in either direction, suggesting that there was no change in the metrics that could be separated from natural variation. The data correlated with the findings of a qualitative analysis and challenges faced in staffing the team towards the end of the analysis period and the eventual disbanding of the IRS.

Research limitations/implications

The analysis was partially hampered by data access challenges, limited to poorly specified aggregate secondary care data, and a poorly specified intervention. Furthermore, the follow-up period was limited by the disbanding of the service.

Originality/value

This analysis indicates that the Harrogate-based IRS team is unlikely to have delivered any sustained quantifiable impact on the intended secondary care outcomes. While this does not necessarily demonstrate a failure of the core principle behind the drive for integrated care, it is an important exploration of the challenges of evaluating such a service.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The research was part-funded by the NIHR CLAHRC Yorkshire and Humber (www.clahrc-yh.nihr.ac.uk). The views expressed are those of the author(s), and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The authors would like to express the authors’ gratitude to the HaRD CCG, Vanguard care team and the rest of the Vanguard evaluation team.

Citation

Hinde, S., Setters, J., Bojke, L., Hex, N. and Richardson, G. (2019), "Does the integration of response services lead to meaningful change in healthcare activity? A case study evaluation", Journal of Integrated Care, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICA-03-2019-0009

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles