Citation
Tan, K.L., Hii, I.S.H., Kong, W.H. and Ting, H. (2024), "Guest editorial: Navigating global challenges: Asian perspectives of globally responsible business leadership", Journal of Global Responsibility, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-10-2024-202
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited
In an era characterised by unprecedented global interconnectedness, the role of business leadership extends far beyond traditional boundaries. As businesses operate globally, the need for responsible leadership has become paramount. This special issue explores the theme of “Globally Responsible Business Leadership”, focusing on Asian perspectives, shedding light on unique approaches, challenges and successes in fostering responsible business practices in this region.
Asian values and global responsibility
Asian values play a pivotal role in shaping the unique perspective of business leaders in the context of globally responsible leadership (Tan, 2023). Deeply rooted in cultural and philosophical traditions, these values influence how Asian leaders approach the intricate balance between economic growth, social responsibility and environmental stewardship (Dillon and Tan, 2023). The principle of harmony, inherent in many Asian cultures, extends to the business landscape, where leaders seek equilibrium within their organisations and globally.
According to Le et al. (2020), this principle underscores the importance of collectivism, emphasising the interconnectedness of individuals within a community. Asian business leaders perceive their companies as integral components of a larger global community, reflecting a comprehensive understanding that fosters collaborative efforts aligning business success with the well-being of the global community (Kitayama et al., 2022). This perspective resonates well with another cultural trait of long-term orientation that supports championing sustainable practices that prioritise the well-being of future generations over short-term gains (Das et al., 2020).
Putting these together, the deep-rootedness of these cultures influences business leaders in Asia to champion environmentally sustainable practices. The interconnectedness between humans and nature guides leaders to actively seek ways to reduce their environmental footprint and contribute sustainability practices for future generations. Ethical considerations, integral to many Asian value systems, further contribute to the foundation of globally responsible business leadership. Stakeholders expect leaders to uphold moral principles and act with integrity personally and professionally (Pless et al., 2021). This commitment to leadership extends to interactions on the global stage, where Asian leaders champion transparent and responsible business practices that align with global standards.
Responsible business practices in Asian businesses
From renewable energy initiatives to waste reduction programs, Asian leaders showcase how business success can align with ecological responsibility. Some of the successful examples include sustainability efforts in the Gardens By the Bay in Singapore (Tan, 2023), waste classification behaviour in China (Ao et al., 2022), usage of green fertiliser by farmers in Malaysia (Adnan et al., 2017), green coffee houses in Vietnam (Le et al., 2021) and Mount Rinjani National Park in Indonesia (Muntasib and Rachmawati, 2023). Yet, the dynamic landscape in Asia unveils a set of distinctive challenges that leaders in the region grapple with.
First, maintaining a delicate balance. The paradox of economic growth and upholding environmental and social responsibility has always been a primary challenge for many organisations (Quang et al., 2023). Within Asia, it is more evident. As Asian economies continue to surge forward, leaders are tasked with aligning robust economic development with sustainable practices (James and Priyadarshini, 2021). This challenge demands innovative approaches beyond traditional business models, encouraging leaders to explore avenues prioritising environmental conservation, social welfare and economic prosperity.
Second, diversity in culture. The diverse array of languages, traditions and customs across Asian countries necessitates a nuanced understanding of local contexts (Mary, 2023). For instance, in India, the celebration of Diwali involves rituals such as lighting lamps, exchanging gifts and holding cultural and religious significance (Fontaine and Richardson, 2005). Meanwhile, in China, the linguistic landscape is marked by Mandarin as the official language, yet regional dialects abound, demanding sensitivity to linguistic variations (Weaver et al., 2017). Cultural symbols, like the dragon in Vietnam or the significance of colours across Asia, necessitate tailored approaches in branding and communication. Hence, leaders’ abilities in effectively navigating this diversity require them to craft strategies that are not only globally applicable but also adaptable to the specific cultural nuances of each market. It calls for a heightened awareness of the social and cultural intricacies that shape consumer behaviour and stakeholder expectations in diverse Asian communities.
Third, regulatory complexities. Leaders face the challenge of addressing regulatory complexities that vary widely within Asia (Mary, 2023). The diverse regulatory frameworks and standards in different Asian countries demand a sophisticated understanding of local legal landscapes. Leaders must navigate this intricate web of regulations to ensure their business practices align with global standards and local requirements. This challenge underscores the need for a flexible and responsive approach to compliance, where businesses can navigate the regulatory landscape with agility and integrity.
Finally, expectations of Asian leaders. In trying to be a responsible business leader within the unique context of Asia’s climate, leaders face distinct challenges intricately tied to the region’s diverse and dynamic environmental considerations. Throughout various organisational levels, a solid political will becomes imperative for fostering collaboration and effective partnerships (Gonzalez et al., 2020). Internally, leaders grapple with encouraging diverse individuals and units to actively communicate and align their strategies, considering the specific environmental nuances of the Asian climate. Externally, the challenge extends to forming strategic alliances that navigate the varied climate conditions and geographical intricacies present across the continent. Hence, communication that bridges divides is essential (Ting et al., 2022). Asian leaders are expected to craft communication that seamlessly unite stakeholders within organisations and across diverse climates in Asia. Additionally, they are expected to establish platforms where individuals, regardless of their positions, understand their roles, take proactive steps and assume responsibilities for a sustainable future shaped by the unique challenges of the Asian context.
However, these challenges should not be viewed solely as impediments. Instead, they are opportunities for innovation and developing new, sustainable business models. Leaders who successfully address the challenges of balancing economic growth with environmental and social responsibility, navigating cultural diversity and managing regulatory complexities can position their organisations as trailblazers in globally responsible business leadership.
Specific topics addressed in this special issue
Against this backdrop, this special issue on “Globally Responsible Business Leadership – Asian Perspectives” discusses the challenges, showcases successes and highlights cultural influences in this region. Ten papers across seven countries of China, India, Malaysia, Myanmar, Singapore, Pakistan and the Philippines comprehensively examine the intricacies of globally responsible business leadership in Asia. These contributions focus into diverse topics, ranging from sustainable practices to the impact of cultural nuances on corporate strategies. Each paper offers valuable insights into the dynamic interplay between globally responsible business leadership, contributing to a nuanced understanding of how leaders navigate the multifaceted landscape of Asian business.
China
The study by Alice Tan and her co-authors focuses on understanding if the role of a globally responsible business leadership could influence the relationship between psychological contract breach and two types of voice behaviour (aggressive and constructive) among Chinese full-time employees. Drawing from the social exchange theory, they found that globally responsible business leadership weakens the negative association between psychological contract breach and constructive voice behaviour while strengthening the positive association between psychological contract breach and aggressive voice behaviour. Another study by Miao He explores how companies respond to local government environmental initiatives by analysing government work reports (GWRs). The study uses a textual analysis of GWRs from Chinese provinces, measuring environmental keywords’ frequency and change rate as indicators of government environmental initiatives. The findings reveal that environmental disclosure scores in environmental, social and governance reports increase with the frequency or change rate of environmental keywords in provincial GWRs, particularly for non–state-owned enterprises, firms in highly marketised provinces or those listed in a single capital market.
India
Bhat Basit’s team examined the relationship between corporate board structure and environmental, social and governance performance for Indian companies. Using the Hensen statistics over ten years and utilising panel data fixed effect estimations, this study contributes to understanding the relevance of stakeholder theory within corporate governance, asserting that corporate governance is accountable for safeguarding stakeholders’ interests. Using secondary data from various sources, Bhat Prathima’s team addresses the relationship between public sector companies’ contribution to sustainable development goals and responsible business leadership. This study addresses the dearth of research in this area and provides a valuable framework for other developing countries to adopt. Finally, Sarkar Shulagna and the team further expanded the concept of responsible leadership by studying the characteristics, qualities and competencies of sustainable leadership at individual, team and organisational levels.
Malaysia
In Malaysia, Chin Chee Hua and his co-researchers’ study addresses gaps in the existing literature within Malaysia’s service sector by examining the impact of responsible leadership traits of relationship building, relational governance and sharing orientation on employees’ sustainable performance. The findings indicate that relationship building and relational governance significantly influence employees’ sustainable performance in the service industry.
Myanmar
The paper by Zin Mie Sharr investigates the traits and challenges of women leaders across different fields in Myanmar. This study is timely considering the recent political challenges the country is facing. In her paper, she reveals that women-responsible leaders exhibit character traits similar to their male counterparts but encounter distinct challenges at both the organisational and societal levels in Myanmar, which include gender bias.
Singapore
The study by Abraham K. Thomas from Singapore underscores the significance of responsible leadership and triple-bottom-line performance in promoting corporate sustainability. In his paper, he highlighted that responsible leadership is identified as having a substantial influence on both businesses and society, contributing to the attainment of long-term corporate sustainability goals. His work introduces a conceptual model illustrating the connection between responsible leadership, the triple bottom line (economic, social and environmental aspects), and the overall achievement of corporate sustainability.
Pakistan
On the other hand, Cham Tat-Huei and his team’s research investigates the relationship between globally responsible leadership (GRL) and pro-environmental behaviour (PEB) in Pakistan’s manufacturing sector. Their findings suggest that businesses can foster PEB by embracing GRL and implementing green management initiatives (GMI), demonstrating a commitment to sustainability and enhancing credibility and competitiveness. Their research contributes new insights to sustainable leadership literature, providing empirical evidence of interrelations between GRL, GMI and PEB and highlighting the mediating role of GMI in this dynamic.
Philippines
Finally, Carmelita’s team examines the impact of lodging infrastructure development on the environmental quality and natural resource management within the Cordillera Administrative Region and its implications for globally responsible leadership. Their findings of the study open an avenue for globally responsible leadership in sustaining environmental quality and preservation of natural resources.
In sum, the ten articles in this special issue, from different Asian countries, aim to contribute to a deeper understanding of the influence of Asian, globally responsible leadership on businesses within this region. Through this issue, the guest editors hope to inspire future dialogue and reflection on the role of Asian businesses in shaping a more sustainable and socially responsible global economy.
References
Adnan, N., Nordin, S. and Rahman, I. (2017), “An integrative framework to study Malaysian paddy farmer’s decision on adoption of green fertilizer technology”, Global Business and Management Research, Vol. 9 No. 1s, pp. 218-229.
Ao, Y., Zhu, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, J. and Chang, Y. (2022), “Identifying the driving factors of rural residents’ household waste classification behavior: evidence from Sichuan, China”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 180, p. 106159, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106159.
Das, M., Rangarajan, K. and Dutta, G. (2020), “Corporate sustainability in SMEs: an Asian perspective”, Journal of Asia Business Studies, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 109-138, doi: 10.1108/jabs-10-2017-0176.
Dillon, R. and Tan, K.-L. (2023), “Cybersecurity workforce landscape, education, and industry growth prospects in Southeast Asia”, Journal of Tropical Futures: Sustainable Business, Governance and Development, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 172-181, doi: 10.1177/27538931231176903.
Fontaine, R. and Richardson, S. (2005), “Cultural values in Malaysia: Chinese, Malays and Indians compared”, Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 63-77, doi: 10.1108/13527600510798141.
Gonzalez, R., Gasco, J. and Llopis, J. (2020), “Information and communication technologies and human resources in hospitality and tourism”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 32 No. 11, pp. 3545-3579, doi: 10.1108/ijchm-04-2020-0272.
James, K.V. and Priyadarshini, R.G. (2021), “Responsible leadership: a new paradigm for organizational sustainability”, Management and Labour Studies, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 452-470, doi: 10.1177/0258042x211005325.
Kitayama, S., Salvador, C.E., Nanakdewa, K., Rossmaier, A., San Martin, A. and Savani, K. (2022), “Varieties of interdependence and the emergence of the modern west: toward the globalising of psychology”, American Psychologist, Vol. 77 No. 9, pp. 991-1006, doi: 10.1037/amp0001073.
Le, H., Newman, A., Menzies, J., Zheng, C. and Fermelis, J. (2020), “Work–life balance in Asia: a systematic review”, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 30 No. 4, p. 100766, doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100766.
Le, A., Tan, K.-L., Yong, S.-S., Soonsap, P., Lipa, C.J. and Ting, H. (2021), “Perceptions towards green image of trendy coffee cafés and intention to re-patronage: the mediating role of customer citizenship behavior”, Young Consumers, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 165-178, doi: 10.1108/YC-03-2021-1291.
Mary, W.M. (2023), “Sustainable business development in the tourism sector and the role of tourism board towards sustainable tourism”, Journal of Responsible Tourism Management, Vol. 3 No. 2, doi: 10.47263/jrtm.03-02-07.
Muntasib, E.K.S.H. and Rachmawati, E. (2023), “Hazard governance model in Mount Rinjani National Park”, Journal of Responsible Tourism Management, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 105-125, doi: 10.47263/jrtm.03-01-07.
Pless, N.M., Sengupta, A., Wheeler, M.A. and Maak, T. (2021), “Responsible leadership and the reflective CEO: resolving stakeholder conflict by imagining what could be done”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 180 No. 1, pp. 1-25, doi: 10.1007/s10551-021-04865-6.
Quang, T.D., Pham, H.N., Nguyen, X.Q.T., Tran, M.N.P., Pham, A.T. and Duong, B.V. (2023), “Towards inclusive tourism in Vietnam: addressing challenges and advancing accessibility for all”, Journal of Responsible Tourism Management, Vol. 3 No. 2, doi: 10.47263/jrtm.03-02-05.
Tan, K.-L. (2023), “Responsible leadership – a brief review of literature”, Journal of Responsible Tourism Management, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 44-55, doi: 10.47263/JRTM.03-01-04.
Ting, H., Tham, A. and Gong, J. (2022), “Responsible business – a timely introspection and future prospects”, Asian Journal of Business Research, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 1-7, doi: 10.14707/ajbr.220124.
Weaver, D.B., Kwek, A. and Wang, Y. (2017), “Cultural connectedness and visitor segmentation in diaspora Chinese tourism”, Tourism Management, Vol. 63, pp. 302-314, doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.06.028.
About the authors
Kim Lim Tan is a lecturer at James Cook University Singapore. Kim Lim’s research seeks to create actionable interventions with impact to create sustainable and behavioural changes concerning the most pressing issues in organisations. His research interests lie primarily in contemporary issues such as the future of work, employee attitudes, sustainability leadership and employee behaviours. Kim Lim’s work was published in several ABDC/SSCI-indexed journals, including the British Food Journal, the European Business Review, Current Issues in Tourism and the Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. Kim Lim is the associate editor for the Journal of Global Responsibility and the editorial advisor for Young Consumers.
Ivy Siaw Hung Hii is a Lecturer in the Faculty of Business at Curtin University Malaysia. She holds a Doctor of Philosophy (Economics and Finance) from Curtin University. Her research interests span the broad field of behavioural studies, delving into financial, consumer and pro-environmental behaviour. Ivy has published in several ABDC/SSCI indexed journals, such as Current Issues in Tourism and the Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. She serves as a member of the editorial review board for the Journal of Global Responsibility.
Weng Hang Kong is an Assistant Professor at the Macao Institute for Tourism Studies. The research interests are destination and attraction management, tourism planning and development. She published in some ABDC-indexed journals, including the Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, the Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management and the Journal of China Tourism Research. She is also the editorial advisory board member for Young Consumers.
Hiram Ting is a Professor in the Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality, i-CATS University College. He is also the Chairman of the Sarawak Research Society and Director of Responsible Borneo (REBORN). Hiram has been actively involved in multidisciplinary behavioural research and consultancy projects, covering topics and issues related to generation marketing, consumer behaviour and responsible tourism. His papers are published in top-tier journals, including the International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, European Journal of Marketing, Internet Research, Journal of Consumer and Retailing Services and Tourism Management. He is also included in the Panel of Tourism Experts for UNWTO.