Personality, belief in a just world, and attitudes toward criminal responsibility defenses: a preliminary study

Robyn Mooney (Department of Psychology, Ashworth Hospital, Liverpool, UK) (Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK)

Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice

ISSN: 2056-3841

Publication date: 28 February 2019

Abstract

Purpose

In Canada, if it can be proven that a defendant was suffering from a mental disorder at the time they committed an offense, they can be found Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder (NCRMD). These cases are often decided by jury. The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of the dark triad (DT), social dominance orientation (SDO) and belief in a just world (BJW) on undergraduate students’ attitudes toward the NCRMD defense.

Design/methodology/approach

A total of 421 undergraduate students completed questionnaires measuring SDO and the DT. After being primed for high, low or neutral BJW, they indicated their attitudes toward NCRMD.

Findings

The BJW manipulation had no effect on attitudes. High-SDO/DT participants held less favorable attitudes toward NCRMD than participants who scored low on these variables, F(1, 420)=20.65, p<0.01, η p 2 = 0.05 . Psychology and criminology students had significantly more favorable attitudes toward NCRMD than business students.

Practical implications

This study can be helpful in improving jury impartiality in trials involving mental illness and criminal responsibility; assessment of SDO and the DT; awareness of career roles relating to insanity defense bias; and improving the voir dire process.

Originality/value

The results of this study may be used to improve the voir dire process in trials involving the issue of mental illness and criminal responsibility and to preserve the impartiality of the jurors selected for these trials.

Keywords

Citation

Mooney, R. (2019), "Personality, belief in a just world, and attitudes toward criminal responsibility defenses: a preliminary study", Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-09-2017-0028

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.