To read this content please select one of the options below:

Nature and duration of the accounting differences between Italian and US GAAP: A case study on conservatism

Alessandro Mura (Scienze Economiche e Aziendali, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy)
Gianluigi Roberto (Scienze Economiche e Aziendali, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy)

Journal of Applied Accounting Research

ISSN: 0967-5426

Article publication date: 6 May 2014

491

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to focus on alternative accounting treatments over time to assess their impact on the level of conservatism in a comparison between Italian local accounting standards and USA generally accepted accounting principles.

Design/methodology/approach

A case study approach is adopted to investigate the accounting adjustments applied to net income and shareholders’ equity as included in the Form 20-F reconciliations reported by all Italian firms that were listed on a US market over the period 1999-2008. The methodology first introduced by Gray (1980) and frequently applied over 30 years to several international accounting comparisons is adapted to recognise a multi-period dimension of the accounting choice. In particular, the paper focuses on the temporal dimension of such adjustments in order to capture their attitude to reverse or become permanent over time.

Findings

The results show that the level of conservatism is visible in the measurement of net assets and is shaped by the prevailing directional effect of accounting adjustments that become permanent as their cumulative reversal is persistently delayed. Such a phenomenon arises and intensifies when the accounting differences relate to recurring operations and/or to long-term assets and liabilities. Amongst them those violating the clean surplus relation are the most controversial as they not only generate a permanent effect in the measurement of net assets, but also an opposite permanent effect in the measurement of earnings.

Research limitations/implications

Future empirical research confirming the finding in different contexts might overcome the limitations of a relatively poor number of observations in the case study.

Practical implications

Identifying the duration of alternative accounting treatments is relevant to assess their potential influence on stakeholders decision-making process as this may steadily influence the future of a firm.

Originality/value

The propositions express a sequence of the timing effects of alternative accounting treatments that highlight the primary role of permanent differences in persistently shaping the value of net assets and help to provide a less erratic interpretation of the level of conservatism.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

JEL Classification — M41

The authors would like to thank the participants to the 2012 EAA conference (Lubjiana) for their valuable suggestions on an earlier draft of this paper. The authors are also grateful to Francesco Vallascas (Leeds University, UK), Mike Jones (University of Bristol, UK) and Grant Samkin (University of Waikato, New Zealand) for their useful comments. Although the paper is a joint effort by the authors, sections 1, 3, 4, can be attributed to Alessandro Mura while sections 2, 5 to Gianluigi Roberto.

Citation

Mura, A. and Roberto, G. (2014), "Nature and duration of the accounting differences between Italian and US GAAP: A case study on conservatism", Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 2-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-04-2012-0027

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles