To read this content please select one of the options below:

From voluntarism to regulation: effects of Directive 2014/95/EU on sustainability reporting in the EU

Philipp Ottenstein (Chair of Accounting and Auditing, HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management, Leipzig, Germany)
Saskia Erben (Chair of Accounting and Auditing, HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management, Leipzig, Germany)
Sébastien Jost (Chair of Accounting and Auditing, HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management, Leipzig, Germany)
Carl William Weuster (Chair of Accounting and Auditing, HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management, Leipzig, Germany)
Henning Zülch (Chair of Accounting and Auditing, HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management, Leipzig, Germany)

Journal of Applied Accounting Research

ISSN: 0967-5426

Article publication date: 12 July 2021

Issue publication date: 1 February 2022

3868

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this paper is to examine the effects of the European Non-financial Reporting Directive (2014/95/EU) on firms' sustainability reporting practices, especially reporting quantity (i.e. availability of information) and quality (i.e. comparability and credibility).

Design/methodology/approach

To test the main hypotheses, the authors select 905 treated firms from the EU 28 + 2 countries for a difference-in-differences regression analysis of dependent variables from the Refinitiv ESG database.

Findings

The results suggest that the Directive influences sustainability reporting quantity and quality. Treated firms provide around 4 percentage points more sustainability information (i.e. availability) than propensity score matched control firms and are 19 percent more likely to receive external assurance (i.e. credibility). However, we also find that the Directive is not the decisive factor in the adoption of GRI guidelines (i.e. comparability).

Research limitations/implications

The analysis is restricted to large listed firms and does not account for small, mid-sized and private firms. Further, cross-cultural differences which influence sustainability reporting are controlled for but not investigated in detail. The authors derive several suggestions for future research related to the NFR Directive and its revision.

Practical implications

The authors’ findings have practical implications for the future development of sustainability reporting in the EU and for other regulators considering the adoption of sustainability reporting.

Originality/value

This study is the first to provide evidence on the NFR Directive's reporting effects across multiple countries. It adds to the growing literature on the consequences of mandatory sustainability reporting. Additionally, this paper introduces a novel measurement approach sustainability information quantity that could benefit researchers.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Andrea Venturelli (Guest Editor), two anonymous reviewers, Benjamin Hammer (Lancaster University), Christian P. Hoffmann (University of Leipzig), Renata Lavrova and Toni Thun (both HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management) and participants of the RIC Conference 2019 at HHL and the doctoral colloquia 2019 and 2020 at HHL for helpful comments and suggestions.

Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Citation

Ottenstein, P., Erben, S., Jost, S., Weuster, C.W. and Zülch, H. (2022), "From voluntarism to regulation: effects of Directive 2014/95/EU on sustainability reporting in the EU", Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 55-98. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-03-2021-0075

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles