The impact of Sarbanes–Oxley and Dodd–Frank on executive compensation

Linda Hughen (Department of Accounting and Information Systems, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA)
Mahfuja Malik (Department of Accounting and Information Systems, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA)
Eunsup Daniel Shim (Department of Accounting and Information Systems, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA)

Journal of Applied Accounting Research

ISSN: 0967-5426

Publication date: 21 June 2019

Abstract

Purpose

The recent economic and political focus on rising income inequality and the extent of government intervention into pay policies has renewed the interest in executive compensation. The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of changing regulatory landscapes on executive pay and its components.

Design/methodology/approach

This study examines a recent 23-year period divided into three distinct intervals separated by two major regulatory changes, the Sarbanes–Oxley Act (SOX) and the Dodd–Frank Act. Bonus, long-term and total compensation are separately modeled as a function of each regulatory change while controlling for firm size, performance and year. The model is estimated using panel data with firm fixed effects. An industry analysis is also conducted to examine sector variations.

Findings

Total compensation increased 29 percent following SOX and 21 percent following Dodd–Frank, above what can be explained by size, firm performance and time. Total compensation increased following both SOX and Dodd–Frank in all industries except for the financial services industry where total compensation was unchanged. Results are robust to using smaller windows around each regulation.

Research limitations/implications

This study does not seek to determine whether executive compensation is at an optimal level at any point in time. Instead, this study focuses only on the change in executive compensation after two specific regulations.

Originality/value

The debate over the extent to which the government should intervene with executive compensation has become a frequent part of political and non-political discourse. This paper provides evidence that over the long-term, regulation does not curtail executive compensation. An important exception is that total compensation was restrained for financial services firms following the Dodd–Frank Act.

Keywords

Citation

Linda Hughen, Mahfuja Malik and Eunsup Daniel Shim (2019) "The impact of Sarbanes–Oxley and Dodd–Frank on executive compensation", Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print

Download as .RIS

DOI

: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-01-2018-0015

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.