Popular preferences for a fully means-tested welfare provision model: social and cross-national divides in Europe
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
ISSN: 0144-333X
Article publication date: 5 June 2020
Issue publication date: 4 December 2020
Abstract
Purpose
Whether welfare provision should be broad-based or selectively targeted at the poor is one of the most common themes in social policy discourse. However, empirical evidence concerning people's preferences about these distributive justice principles is very limited. The current paper aims to bridge this gap, by analyzing Europeans' opinions about a hypothetical transformation of the welfare state that would provide social transfers and services only to people on low incomes.
Design/methodology/approach
The analysis draws on data from the 2016 European Social Survey and covers 21 countries. In order to understand what would motivate people to support the complete means testing of welfare provision, we use multilevel models with individual-level and contextual predictors.
Findings
The results show that the upper and middle classes are the most opposed to the idea, presumably as they would be the net losers from such a reform. Furthermore, our results indicate that more-egalitarian people show a higher level of support for means testing, even though the political left has traditionally promoted universalism. Some key characteristics of the welfare state also matter: People are more likely to endorse complete means testing in countries with less-generous provision and a higher incidence of poverty. However, the extent to which the existing welfare state relies on means testing has no influence on people's opinions about implementing a fully means-tested welfare model.
Practical implications
Some of the key findings are likely to be of interest to activists advocating on behalf of the poor and the socially vulnerable. Although it is generally assumed that universal provision is the best strategy to address the needs of disadvantaged people, our results suggest that from an electoral point of view, targeting within universalism may be a more appealing welfare strategy.
Originality/value
This paper details one of the very few studies to examine preferences for means-tested welfare provision in a comparative context. In addition, one of the contextual variables used in the analysis – the proportion of means-tested social benefits out of the total expenditure on social benefits – is unique to this study.
Keywords
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback.Funding: This work was supported by the Flemish Research Foundation (FWO) grant # IRI I001519N.
Citation
Gugushvili, D. and van Oorschot, W. (2020), "Popular preferences for a fully means-tested welfare provision model: social and cross-national divides in Europe", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 40 No. 11/12, pp. 1455-1472. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-03-2020-0108
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited