Roscher’s epistemological and methodological position: Its
importance for the Methodenstreit
Abstract
According to a widely accepted view, the Methodenstreit between the historical and Austrian school was the result of misunderstandings. Argues that it was rather the outcome of different solutions to genuine philosophical and methodological problems, in particular to a demarcation problem. Presents a reconstruction of the position of Roscher. Argues that Roscher sought to solve a demarcation problem and therefore triggered a problem situation which was of fundamental importance for further discussion. Contrasts the views of Roscher and Menger. Argues that Menger′s views constitute a direct response to Roscher′s problem situation.
Keywords
Citation
Milford, K. (1995), "Roscher’s epistemological and methodological position: Its
importance for the
Publisher
:MCB UP Ltd
Copyright © 1995, MCB UP Limited