To read this content please select one of the options below:

The supportability evaluation of cross-regional major infrastructure projects based on the combination weighting of the game theory–cloud model

Minggong Zhang (School of Management, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China) (Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao Bridge Authority, Zhuhai, China)
Xiaolong Xue (School of Management, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China)
Ting Luo (School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China)
Mengmeng Li (School of Management, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China)
Xiaoling Tang (Dongguan Dapingzhang Forest Park, Dongguan, China)

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

ISSN: 0969-9988

Article publication date: 23 May 2023

Issue publication date: 10 September 2024

157

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to establish an evaluation method for cross-regional major infrastructure project (CRMIP) supportability. The focus is to identify evaluation indicators from a complexity perspective and develop an evaluation model using qualitative and quantitative methods. Case studies are carried out to verify the reliability of the evaluation model, thereby providing theoretical and practical guidance for CRMIP operations and maintenance (O&M).

Design/methodology/approach

Guided by the idea of complexity management, the evaluation indicators of CRMIP supportability are determined through literature analysis, actual O&M experience and expert interviews. A combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, consisting of sequential relationship analysis, entropy weighting, game theory and cloud model, is developed to determine the indicator weights. Finally, the evaluation model is used to evaluate the supportability of the Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao Bridge (HZMB), which tests the rationality of the model and reveals its supportability level.

Findings

The results demonstrate that CRMIPs' supportability is influenced by 6 guideline-level and 18 indicator-level indicators, and the priority of the influencing factors includes “organization,” “technology,” “system,” “human resources,” “material system,” and “funding.” As for specific indicators, “organizational objectives,” “organizational structure and synergy mechanism,” and “technical systems and procedures” are critical to CRMIPs' O&M supportability. The results also indicate that the supportability level of the HZMB falls between good and excellent.

Originality/value

Under the guidance of complexity management thinking, this study proposes a supportability evaluation framework based on the combined weights of game theory and the cloud model. This study provides a valuable reference and scientific judgment for the health and safety of CRMIPs' O&M.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 18ZDA043). The authors were also grateful to the Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate of Guangzhou University (No. 2019GDJC-D20).

Citation

Zhang, M., Xue, X., Luo, T., Li, M. and Tang, X. (2024), "The supportability evaluation of cross-regional major infrastructure projects based on the combination weighting of the game theory–cloud model", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 31 No. 9, pp. 3679-3705. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2022-0820

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles