To read this content please select one of the options below:

Exploring the benefits and trade-offs of design standardization in capital projects

Jin Ouk Choi (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA)
Binit Kumar Shrestha (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA)
Young Hoon Kwak (Department of Decision Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA)
Jennifer Shane (Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA)

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

ISSN: 0969-9988

Article publication date: 6 April 2021

Issue publication date: 24 March 2022

412

Abstract

Purpose

Facility design standardization strategy has considerable advantages, highlighted by its widespread and consistent use in the shipbuilding and manufacturing industries. However, capital projects have failed to realize these benefits. The primary rationale behind this problem is the lack of proper understanding of design standardization, more specifically the benefits and equally importantly, the trade-offs of design standardization in capital projects. Therefore, this study highlights 13 benefits and six trade-offs of standardization in connection to design standardization, along with specific examples.

Design/methodology/approach

To achieve the study objectives, the researchers identified the most impactful benefits and trade-offs in terms of economic impact by surveying prominent players in the industry. Furthermore, the researchers examined 43 actual case projects (a case study) executed with the standardization strategy to evaluate the industry's status in terms of the levels of advantage achievement and disadvantage incurrence.

Findings

The results of this survey show that design once, reuse multiple times and design and procurement in advance are the most impactful benefits. Similarly, susceptible to changes in the market conditions is one of the top trade-offs that can be incurred in capital projects when implementing standardization. The results also highlight that design once, reuse multiple times is one of the most achieved benefits in standardized capital projects today, while cost of establishing the design standard is the most incurred trade-off.

Originality/value

This study provides important insight into how standardization strategy can be advantageous while also enriching the literature about pitfalls expected from standardization. Moreover, this study's results will help the industrial sector achieve higher levels of design standardization by providing a better understanding of the benefits and trade-offs of design standardization.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The results and information in this paper are based on research funded by the Construction Industry Institute (CII) through the Research Team for UMM-01 standardization. The researchers wish to thank the CII for their support. The researchers would also like to express their gratitude to the research team members and the survey and case study participants who donated their valuable time and effort for this study.

Citation

Choi, J.O., Shrestha, B.K., Kwak, Y.H. and Shane, J. (2022), "Exploring the benefits and trade-offs of design standardization in capital projects", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 1169-1193. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2020-0661

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles