To read this content please select one of the options below:

Financial anatomy of E4 Helsinki-Lahti shadow toll PPP-project

Pekka Leviäkangas (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland)
Marcus Wigan (Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia)
Harri Haapasalo (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland)

Built Environment Project and Asset Management

ISSN: 2044-124X

Article publication date: 18 November 2013

653

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the returns to the investors and the state in private finance of road infrastructure. It uses an empirical case of the E4 Helsinki-Lahti road, which was built in 1995-1999 in Finland as the first real PPP-project.

Design/methodology/approach

The analysis adopts an approach based on cash flow modelling of the project and the analyses show how the cash flows are formed and divided between the various stakeholders. The pure cash flow based approach to compare the economics of PPP vs traditional procurement of road infrastructure projects produced results that pose challenges to the logic, and pros and cons of shadow toll PPPs.

Findings

The analysis shows that potential win-win situations are hard to find in shadow toll arrangements. This is largely due to the different discount rates used by investors and state. It is argued that the state does not include all the true costs in its appraisal of projects. Private investors, in principle and as a rule, price all of the relevant risks and uncertainties of which they are cognisant.

Originality/value

The paper presents an analytical cash flow model that can be applied a wider range of PPP projects than simply to shadow toll roads. The paper contributes to the discussion on the viability of PPPs in different contexts.

Keywords

Citation

Leviäkangas, P., Wigan, M. and Haapasalo, H. (2013), "Financial anatomy of E4 Helsinki-Lahti shadow toll PPP-project", Built Environment Project and Asset Management, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-04-2012-0017

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles