The purpose of this paper is to expose a classical Vitruvian archetype and subject it to the logic of deconstruction. The process engages two opposing camps and mindsets, and, through analysis, reaches a point that allows the reader to make assessments on how the archetype fulfills the perceived objectives of its time and how it can be assessed through a more contemporary methodology.
This study employs two methodologies in the analysis of an architectural model that became a reference point in the evolution of Western Architecture. A traditional approach similar to Ruskin’s Victorian-style analysis and criticism builds the study’s foundations. That is followed by the method of deconstructivism, challenging the traditional thought, resurfacing of the duality of every attribute assigned to the initial datum. Initially, the study brings to the proscenium the nature of this classical order as a sui generis archetype, defining the engendered properties that describe it. That is followed by an inverse process as applied by the twentieth-century deconstructivist movement.
The paper finds the dichotomy of perception of a classical archetype based upon the methods applied.
Recognition of a dichotomy of perception of a classical architectural archetype becomes overture toward a number of well-defined archetypes based on what could be considered Cartesian non-complex architectural archetypes.
This paper offers a Gestalt-based reflection on the nature of the Doric order.
Charalambides, J. (2019), "Rediscovering the essence in a classical order through analysis and deconstruction: Contradicting study through the methods of John Ruskin and Jacques Derrida", Archnet-IJAR, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 218-236. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-12-2018-0031Download as .RIS
Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited