To read this content please select one of the options below:

Installed nacelle aerodynamics at cruise and windmilling conditions

Francisco Sánchez-Moreno (Centre of Propulsion and Thermal Power Engineering, School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Bedford, UK)
David MacManus (Centre of Propulsion and Thermal Power Engineering, School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Bedford, UK)
Fernando Tejero (Centre of Propulsion and Thermal Power Engineering, School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Bedford, UK)
Josep Hueso-Rebassa (Centre of Propulsion and Thermal Power Engineering, School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Bedford, UK)
Christopher Sheaf (Rolls-Royce plc., Derby, UK)

Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology

ISSN: 0002-2667

Article publication date: 11 July 2024

Issue publication date: 7 August 2024

89

Abstract

Purpose

The decrease in specific thrust achieved by Ultra-High Bypass Ratio (UHBPR) aero-engines allows for a reduction in specific fuel consumption. However, the typical associated larger fan size might increase the nacelle drag, weight and the detrimental interference effects with the airframe. Consequently, the benefits from the new UHBPR aero-engine cycle may be eroded. This paper aims to evaluate the potential improvement in the aerodynamic performance of compact nacelles for installed aero-engine configuration.

Design/methodology/approach

Drooped and scarfed non-axisymmetric compact and conventional nacelle designs were down selected from a multi-point CFD-based optimisation. These were computationally assessed at a set of installation positions on a contemporary wide-body, twin-engine transonic aircraft. Both cruise and off-design conditions were evaluated. A thrust and drag accounting method was applied to evaluate different aircraft, powerplant and nacelle performance metrics.

Findings

The aircraft with the compact nacelle configuration installed at a typical installation position provided a reduction in aircraft cruise fuel consumption of 0.44% relative to the conventional architecture. However, at the same installation position, the compact design exhibits a large flow separation at windmilling conditions that is translated into an overall aircraft drag penalty of approximately 5.6% of the standard cruise net thrust. Additionally, the interference effects of a compact nacelle are more sensitive to deviations in mass flow capture ratio (MFCR) from the nominal windmilling diversion condition.

Originality/value

This work provides a comprehensive analysis of not only the performance but also the aerodynamics at an aircraft level of compact nacelles compared to conventional configurations for a range of installations positions at cruise. Additionally, the engine-airframe integration aerodynamics is assessed at an off-design windmilling condition which constitutes a key novelty of this paper.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This project has received funding from the Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under Grant Agreement No 820997.

For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising.

The funding comes from Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under Grant Agreement No 820997.

Citation

Sánchez-Moreno, F., MacManus, D., Tejero, F., Hueso-Rebassa, J. and Sheaf, C. (2024), "Installed nacelle aerodynamics at cruise and windmilling conditions", Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, Vol. 96 No. 6, pp. 757-768. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-03-2023-0070

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, © Authors

Related articles