To read this content please select one of the options below:

CFTC proposes harmonization rules for mutual funds

Rita Molesworth (Based at Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, New York, New York, USA)
Deborah A. Tuchman (Based at Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, New York, New York, USA)
Dianne E. O'Donnell (Based at Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, New York, New York, USA)
Jonathan Burwick (Based at Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, New York, New York, USA)
James Lippert (Based at Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, New York, New York, USA)

Journal of Investment Compliance

ISSN: 1528-5812

Article publication date: 7 September 2012

66

Abstract

Purpose

The paper aims to analyze amendments proposed by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission to its disclosure, recordkeeping and reporting rules that are designed to resolve or minimize certain conflicts between CFTC rules and US Securities and Exchange Commission rules applicable to registered investment companies (Futures RICs) whose futures and swaps trading will subject their advisers to regulation as commodity pool operators as a result of the amendments to CFTC Rule 4.5.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper explains certain significant differences between the CFTC's rules applicable to commodity pool operators (CPOs) and the SEC's rules applicable to Futures RICs and their advisers in the areas of disclosure, reporting and recordkeeping and describes how the CFTC's proposed rules for Futures RICs are intended to resolve or minimize conflicts with SEC rules.

Findings

CFTC and SEC rules differ in several significant areas, including the required contents of the disclosure document by which the pool is offered; when the disclosure document has to be delivered; how disclosure documents are updated and reviewed; when periodic reports are required to be made and what they are required to contain; and whether required books and records may be maintained at a location other than the main business office. The proposed harmonization rules attempt to resolve these conflicts by exempting the CPOs of Futures RICs from certain CFTC requirements regarding delivery of disclosure documents and recordkeeping, permitting CFTC‐required disclosures to appear in the prospectuses of Futures RICs after the SEC‐required disclosures and requiring monthly account statements to be posted to the CPO's website rather than distributed to shareholders of Futures RICs. Other conflicts between CFTC and SEC rules applicable to Futures RICs were not addressed by the proposed harmonization rules.

Practical implications

The proposed harmonization rules attempt to adapt CFTC requirements to Futures RICs that have not been subject to CFTC regulation since 2003. Other conflicts between CFTC and SEC rules were not addressed. The CFTC has not adopted the final rules in this area.

Originality/value

The paper provides expert guidance by lawyers experienced in regulation of CPOs and RICs.

Keywords

Citation

Molesworth, R., Tuchman, D.A., O'Donnell, D.E., Burwick, J. and Lippert, J. (2012), "CFTC proposes harmonization rules for mutual funds", Journal of Investment Compliance, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 46-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/15285811211266100

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2012, Authors

Related articles