To read this content please select one of the options below:

Untoward employee whistleblower claims under Sarbanes‐Oxley

Cheryl Bryson (Partner, Duane Morris LLP, Chicago, USA; cbbryson@duanemorris.com)
Robert Bramnik (Partner, Duane Morris LLP, Chicago and New York, SA; rebramnik@duanemorris.com)
Rachel Lutner (Counsel,Duane Morris, LLP, Chicago, USA; relutner@duanemorris.com)

Journal of Investment Compliance

ISSN: 1528-5812

Article publication date: 1 April 2003

152

Abstract

Few new laws in recent years have inspired as much attention as the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 (Act). The procedural and substantive requirements of the Act have, and will continue to have, far reaching impact on and implications for all issuers of securities and their officers, directors, and other controlling persons. However, for employers who are participants in the financial services industry (such as broker‐dealers, investment advisors, fund advisors and managers, and others), the Act raises an unintended and untoward consequence, which appears to have passed under the radar screens of most commentators.

Keywords

Citation

Bryson, C., Bramnik, R. and Lutner, R. (2003), "Untoward employee whistleblower claims under Sarbanes‐Oxley", Journal of Investment Compliance, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/15285810310813031

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2003, MCB UP Limited

Related articles