Intangible assets valuation in the Malaysian capital market

Norhana Salamudin (Institute of Business Excellence, Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia)
Ridzwan Bakar (Telekom Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)
Muhd Kamil Ibrahim (Universiti Teknologi MARA, Segamat, Malaysia)
Faridah Haji Hassan (Institute of Business Excellence, Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia)

Journal of Intellectual Capital

ISSN: 1469-1930

Publication date: 27 July 2010



This study examines the intangible assets value of the Malaysian market. It measures the relationship between intangible assets and corporate market value of Malaysian firms and whether they are consistent with findings in other advanced markets.


Firstly, the development of intangible assets of Malaysian companies over 2000 to 2006 were measured statistically using Landsman's balance sheet identity model. Then, cross‐sectional multi‐regression procedure was used to ascertain the relationship between intangible assets and financial performance.


The findings reveal that the Malaysian market developed intangible assets at a rather slow pace, with significant development from year 2004 onwards. It also reveals that the book value of net assets (BVNA) are still dominant in Malaysian corporate valuation but this trend is declining as greater interest has now been developed in employing intangible assets and earnings as important variables. Furthermore, the results indicate that there is a positive trend in intangible assets development in Malaysia, consistent with those of advanced markets such as the US, Europe and Australia. However, the Malaysian market lags by about 20 years as compared to the more advanced ones.

Research limitations/implications

The limitations of this paper are as follows: the time frame for this study was seven years and it looked at the post‐financial crisis period. A longer time frame may be desirable covering both pre‐ and post‐crisis periods. Secondly, this study did not look into intangible assets at the micro‐level perspective. Unless solid definition, classification, measurement and valuation of intangible assets have been ascertained, it is not worth dwelling on individual assets, such as brand, research and development (R&D), and human capital.


The main contribution of this study is that it provides empirical evidence that intangible assets or intellectual assets are strategic assets that require close attention in line with development of the knowledge‐based economy.



Salamudin, N., Bakar, R., Kamil Ibrahim, M. and Haji Hassan, F. (2010), "Intangible assets valuation in the Malaysian capital market", Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 391-405.

Download as .RIS



Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2010, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below

You may be able to access this content by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.