To read this content please select one of the options below:

Project alliancing vs project partnering: a case study of the Australian National Museum Project

Derek H.T. Walker (Derek H.T. Walker is Professor of Construction Management at the RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.)
Keith Hampson (Keith Hampson is CEO at the Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.)
Renaye Peters (Renaye Peters is a Research Assistant, both at the Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.)

Supply Chain Management

ISSN: 1359-8546

Article publication date: 1 May 2002

5821

Abstract

Significant differences between project partnering and project alliancing occur in the selection process, management structure of the organisations undertaking the project and nature of risk and reward incentives. This paper helps clarify the nature of project alliancing and how alliance member organisations were selected for this case study. A core issue that differentiates between the two approaches is that in partnering, partners may reap rewards at the expense of other partners. In alliancing each alliance member places their profit margin and reward structure “at risk”. Thus in alliancing, the entire alliance entity either benefits together or not all. This fundamentally changes the motivation and dynamics of the relationship between alliance members.

Keywords

Citation

Walker, D.H.T., Hampson, K. and Peters, R. (2002), "Project alliancing vs project partnering: a case study of the Australian National Museum Project", Supply Chain Management, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540210425830

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2002, MCB UP Limited

Related articles