To read this content please select one of the options below:

Professional accountancy education in selected ECSAFA countries: a comparative study

L. Stainbank (School of Accounting, University of KwaZulu‐Natal)
G. Ramatho (Botswana Institute of Administration and Commerce)

Meditari Accountancy Research

ISSN: 1022-2529

Article publication date: 1 October 2008

329

Abstract

Investigations into professional accountancy education gathered impetus with the publication of The impact of globalisation on accountancy education by Karreman in 2002. This publication provided a comparative analysis of professional accountancy education in 25 countries worldwide, using a model developed for the classification of accountancy education systems. The rationale behind such an exercise is to promote educational exchange and facilitate educational development. The Karreman study only covered two countries in Africa, namely South Africa and Kenya. This study expands the Karreman study by comparing and benchmarking the professional accountancy education programmes in six member countries of the Eastern, Central and Southern African Federation of Accountants (ECSAFA) using the Karreman methodology. This study reports the results of a questionnaire survey to which seven accountancy bodies located in six countries responded. The results of this study revealed mostly agreement with the Karreman model. All the countries could be categorised as developing countries with common law/Roman‐Dutch legal systems and with a strong British influence. Thus similarities in regulation, education and practical experience are expected. The professional bodies tend towards professional selfregulation with low to medium membership regulation. All countries require practical experience before qualifying, and a theoretical approach to the final examination predominates. The study also shows that there is co‐operation in the region.

Keywords

Citation

Stainbank, L. and Ramatho, G. (2008), "Professional accountancy education in selected ECSAFA countries: a comparative study", Meditari Accountancy Research, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 153-173. https://doi.org/10.1108/10222529200800018

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2008, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles