Touch‐screen versus paper‐and‐pen questionnaires

Bodil Wilde Larsson (Division for Health and Caring Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden)

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

ISSN: 0952-6862

Publication date: 1 June 2006

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the paper is to compare the computer administration method (touch‐screen) with the original paper‐and‐pen approach when measuring patients' perceptions of care quality.

Design/methodology/approach

The study group consisted of 199 patients who responded to touch‐screen and 219 who responded to paper‐and‐pen questionnaires, receiving care between January and March 2003 at two out‐patient clinics in one county in Sweden. The response rate was 75 per cent. A modified version of the quality from the patient's perspective questionnaire was used.

Findings

Two main findings emerged: first, both methods yielded almost identical results in quality of care ratings, and second, the touch‐screen method was perceived to be easier to use and to take less time to complete.

Originality/value

The paper shows that both methods are acceptable, but the touch‐screen method appears to be preferred by patients.

Keywords

Citation

Wilde Larsson, B. (2006), "Touch‐screen versus paper‐and‐pen questionnaires", International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 328-338. https://doi.org/10.1108/09526860610671382

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.