To read this content please select one of the options below:

Who are the problem‐prone officers? An analysis of citizen complaints

Kim Michelle Lersch (University of West Florida, Pensacola)
Tom Mieczkowski (University of South Florida, St Petersburg)

American Journal of Police

ISSN: 0735-8547

Article publication date: 1 September 1996



Citizen complaints filed against a small group of officers of a large police department in the south‐eastern USA were used to conduct an examination of repeat offenders and non‐repeat offenders. Examines differences between the offenders in the areas of officer characteristics, complaint characteristics and citizen characteristics. Finds that the all‐male group of repeat offenders was significantly younger and less experienced than their peers and was more likely to be accused of harassment. Finds that the ethnic minority group was more likely to file complaints against repeat offenders and that a disproportionate number of complaints were intraracial. Detects a cause for concern in that several high‐ranking officers reacted to the survey by reappraising the data and classing the greater offenders as productive and conscientious officers, i.e., denotes belief at high level within the police organization that a good officer should generate dissatisfaction among the general public.



Michelle Lersch, K. and Mieczkowski, T. (1996), "Who are the problem‐prone officers? An analysis of citizen complaints", American Journal of Police, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 23-44.




Copyright © 1996, MCB UP Limited

Related articles