To read this content please select one of the options below:

Before‐tax versus after‐tax earnings as performance measures in compensation contracts

T.J. Attwood (School of Accountancy, 332 Middlebush Hall, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211)
Thomas C. Omer (Department of Accounting, University of Illinois at Chicago, 601 S Morgan m/c 006, Chicago, IL 60607)
Marjorie K. Shelley (Department of Accountancy, Rm 360 Commerce West, University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign, 1206 South Sixth St., Champaign, IL 61820)

Managerial Finance

ISSN: 0307-4358

Article publication date: 1 November 1998

634

Abstract

Reviews previous research on factors affecting the choice of using before‐ or after‐tax performance measures to determine executive compensation; and uses regression techniques on a sample of US firms to test the relationship between this choice and various factors suggested by the literature. Shows that after‐tax measures are more likely to be used in service industries and are positively related to firm size, multinational operations, the number of operating segments and capital intensity; but negatively related to leverage. Suggests that firms with more tax planning opportunities use post‐tax performance measures to encourage managers to consider the tax consequences of their actions, but trade off large debt tax shields in favour of other ways to plan tax.

Keywords

Citation

Attwood, T.J., Omer, T.C. and Shelley, M.K. (1998), "Before‐tax versus after‐tax earnings as performance measures in compensation contracts", Managerial Finance, Vol. 24 No. 11, pp. 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074359810765697

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1998, MCB UP Limited

Related articles