To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

Dividend payout and executive compensation: theory and Canadian evidence

Nalinaksha Bhattacharyya (University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska, USA)
Amin Mawani (Schulich School of Business, York University, Toronto, Canada)
Cameron K.J. Morrill (I.H. Asper School of Business, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada)

Managerial Finance

ISSN: 0307-4358

Article publication date: 4 July 2008

Abstract

Purpose

This paper seeks to present and test a model of the association between dividend payout and executive compensation.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors develop a model based on Bhattacharyya whereby managerial quality is unobservable to shareholders, and therefore first‐best contracts are not possible. In the second‐best world, compensation contracts motivate high quality managers to retain and invest firm earnings, while low quality managers are motivated to distribute income to shareholders. These hypotheses arising from the model are tested on data for Canadian firms' dividend payouts over the period 1993‐1995 using tobit regression analyses.

Findings

Consistent with the predictions of the Bhattacharyya model, the results show that, ceteris paribus, earnings retention (dividend payout) is positively (negatively) associated with executive compensation. These results hold when payout is defined as common dividends plus common share repurchases.

Research limitations/implications

The Canadian data provide only limited information on the components of executive compensation. A more useful test would be possible with more detailed information on, for example, salary, bonus, and benefits.

Originality/value

Several recent papers have documented an association between dividends and executive compensation. This paper presents and tests a model that provides a potential explanation for this link.

Keywords

Citation

Bhattacharyya, N., Mawani, A. and Morrill, C.K.J. (2008), "Dividend payout and executive compensation: theory and Canadian evidence", Managerial Finance, Vol. 34 No. 8, pp. 585-601. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350810874091

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2008, Emerald Group Publishing Limited