The nature of social economics: A personal commentary
Abstract
This article explores what is meant by social economics in a set of ten specific commentaries or interpretations which appear to be widely accepted by social economists. In brief those commentaries are organized and presented in the following manner. Social economics is: heterodox; evolutionary, revolutionary, and counter‐revolutionary; a social science; a moral science; social economics because it addresses the social question; recognizes that the invisible hand does not protect the common good; anthropocentric; teleological; has vision; and has a three‐part structure. This article tends toward simplicity and brevity, the better to set forth the essential nature of social economics. Social economics is more than just a subspecialty area within or a branch of the tree of conventional economic thought. Rather social economics is an entire body of thought, a different way of thinking about economic affairs. It resembles mainstream economics in the same way that one tree resembles another. But it is a separate tree, with its own life force supplied by the scholarly energies of those who identify with social economics.
Keywords
Citation
O’Boyle, E.J. (1999), "The nature of social economics: A personal commentary", International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 26 No. 1/2/3, pp. 46-57. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299910229488
Publisher
:MCB UP Ltd
Copyright © 1999, MCB UP Limited