To read this content please select one of the options below:

Taking advantage: informal social mechanisms and equal opportunities policies

Peter Taylor‐Gooby (SSPSSR, CoNE, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK)

International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy

ISSN: 0144-333X

Article publication date: 21 June 2011

733

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine how factors including class position, education, social network membership and cultural capital contribute to the intergenerational transmission of class advantage for women and men in different European welfare states.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper analyses the European Social Survey round 1 data.

Findings

Education is the dominant institutional mechanism for reproduction of privilege, but social network membership plays an important subsidiary role. The contribution of membership is highly gendered, even in the overtly more open social democratic and liberal societies.

Research limitations/implications

There were data limitations in ESS: no time‐series data, and no data on wealth.

Practical implications

The findings are of particular policy relevance at a time when reform programmes are stressing individual opportunity and shifting responsibility from state to citizen, so that informal pathways to the reproduction of privilege become more significant. These include network membership, contacts and cultural capital.

Social implications

The research indicates the importance of social network membership and sheds light on how this works to the advantage of middle and upper class groups and men in different European countries.

Originality/value

No other studies have used these data to explore these issues to the author's knowledge, and one needs to understand more about these issues in the context of current concerns about inequality and opportunity.

Keywords

Citation

Taylor‐Gooby, P. (2011), "Taking advantage: informal social mechanisms and equal opportunities policies", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 31 No. 5/6, pp. 253-271. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443331111141255

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles