The Assumed Linearity of Organizational Phenomena: Implications for Occupational Stress and Well-Being

Abstract

Theory and method are inherently intertwined in the creation and maintenance of most areas of scientific inquiry. The organizational sciences, in general, and the occupational stress area, in particular, are no exceptions. In this paper, we argue that an implicit supposition of linear independent–dependent variable forms has driven both theory and method, and as such, presents a characterization of organizational science and stress scholarship that is incomplete at best. We also review stress literature that has acknowledged the potential for nonlinear stressor–strain associations and offer empirical examples of both restricted and non-restricted nonlinearity. We conclude by offering prescriptions for scholars conducting research that extends beyond the examination of linear forms exclusively.

Citation

Ferris, G.R., Bowen, M.G., Treadway, D.C., Hochwarter, W.A., Hall, A.T. and Perrewé, P.L. (2006), "The Assumed Linearity of Organizational Phenomena: Implications for Occupational Stress and Well-Being", Perrewé, P.L. and Ganster, D.C. (Ed.) Employee Health, Coping and Methodologies (Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being, Vol. 5), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 203-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3555(05)05006-7