To read this content please select one of the options below:

THE PROBLEM OF THE STATUS OF THE STATUS QUO: SOME COMMENTS

A Research Annual

ISBN: 978-0-76231-089-0, eISBN: 978-1-84950-257-3

Publication date: 18 February 2004

Abstract

One important discussion comes under Knight’s heading of “Social Control.” To appreciate his argument, one has to understand that Knight’s social theory is developed within a tension between: (1) his knowledge that social control is both inevitable and necessary; and (2) his correlative desire for individual autonomy. One could add to that a hatred of social control, some of which is relevant. But what Knight dislikes is, first, selective elements of existing social control and, second, change of social control, e.g. change of the law by law, except for those changes of the law that remove the selective elements he dislikes; Knight is not opposed to all change of social control. In any event, the problem of social control is also for Knight (as it was for Vilfredo Pareto) the problems of social change and of the status of the status quo as well as of hierarchy.

Citation

Samuels, W.J. (2004), "THE PROBLEM OF THE STATUS OF THE STATUS QUO: SOME COMMENTS", Samuels, W.J. (Ed.) A Research Annual (Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, Vol. 22 Part 1), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 235-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-4154(03)22015-0

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2003, Emerald Group Publishing Limited