To read this content please select one of the options below:

The training implications of the Government White Paper Fairness at Work

W. David Rees (W. David Rees is an Independent Consultant based in London, UK. Christine Porter is Chair of the Human Resource Management Department at the University of Westminster’s Business School, London, UK)
Christine Porter (Christine Porter is Chair of the Human Resource Management Department at the University of Westminster’s Business School, London, UK)

Industrial and Commercial Training

ISSN: 0019-7858

Article publication date: 1 February 1999

631

Abstract

Outlines key areas of the Government White Paper Fairness at Work. Identifies the training implications in the proposed changes in collective law and in the improvements in the individual rights of employees. Concludes that the most important training needs are likely to arise in the extension of unfair dismissal protection and the right for employees to have trade union representation in disciplinary and grievance hearings. Also examines the training needs arising out of the arbitration option in unfair dismissal proceedings and those arising out of the establishment of a National Minimum Wage and other legislative developments, including the Working Time Regulations. Examines also the issue of collective bargaining about training. This is an issue that the Government is considering, as opposed to proposing.

Keywords

Citation

Rees, W.D. and Porter, C. (1999), "The training implications of the Government White Paper Fairness at Work", Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 4-8. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197859910253092

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1999, MCB UP Limited

Related articles