Search results

Scholarship on reputation in and of organizations has been going on for decades, and it always has separated along level of analysis issues, whereby the separate literatures on individual, group/team/unit, and organization reputation fail to acknowledge each other. This sends the implicit message that reputation is a fundamentally different phenomenon at the three different levels of analysis. We tested the validity of this implicit assumption by conducting a multilevel review of the reputation literature, and drawing conclusions about the “level-specific” or “level-generic” nature of the reputation construct. The review results permitted the conclusion that reputation phenomena are essentially the same at all levels of analysis. Based on this, we frame a future agenda for theory and research on reputation.

Corporate reputation is a strategic asset leading to numerous positive firm-level outcomes. Motivated by the prediction that the translation of customer-based corporate reputation to customer-level outcomes (trust, customer–company identification, and word-of-mouth intentions) might be highly context-dependent, we investigate the moderating role of national culture (particularly, individualism–collectivism dimension) and individual trait (self-construal) in the association between reputational dimensions (product and service efficacy, market prominence, and societal ethicality) and their outcomes. Using survey data from two countries (US and India, N = 812), we estimate the effects of corporate reputation on focal outcomes, moderated by country as a proxy for individualism/collectivism and independent self-construal (IND)/interdependent self-construal (INTER). The results strongly suggest that when individual-level variables are taken into account, the country-level variable does not affect the translation of reputational dimensions to customer-level outcomes. Moreover, individuals high on IND are more responsive to utilitarian (egoistic) reputational dimensions of product and service efficacy, whereas individuals high on INTER are more sensitive to the group-oriented reputation for market prominence and society-oriented reputation for social ethicality. The reported findings have major implications for cross-country reputational research and global reputation management strategies.

We model the interaction between a profit-maximizing firm and an activist using an infinite-horizon dynamic stochastic game. The firm enhances its reputation through “self-regulation”: voluntary provision of an abatement activity that reduces a negative externality. We show that in equilibrium the externality-reducing activity is subject to decreasing marginal returns, which can cause the firm to “coast on its reputation,” that is, decrease the level of externality-reducing activity as its reputation grows. The activist, which benefits from increases in the externality-reducing activity, can take two types of action that can harm the firm’s reputation: criticism, which can impair the firm’s reputation on the margin, and confrontation, which can trigger a crisis that may severely damage the firm’s reputation. The activist changes the reputational dynamics of the game by tending to keep the firm in reputational states in which it is highly motivated to invest in externality-reducing activity. Criticism and confrontational activity are shown to be imperfect substitutes. The more patient the activist or the more passionate it is about externality reduction, the more likely it is to rely on confrontation. The more patient the firm and the more important corporate citizenship is to firm’s brand equity, the more likely that it will be targeted by an activist that relies on confrontation.

Accountability is ubiquitous in social systems, and its necessity is magnified in formal organizations, whose purpose has been argued to predict and control behavior. The very notion of organizing necessitates answering to others, and this feature implies an interface of work and social enterprises, the individuals comprising them, and subunits from dyads to divisions. Because the nature of workplace accountability is multi-level as well as interactive, single-level conceptualizations of the phenomenon are incomplete and inherently misleading. In response, this chapter sets forth a meso-level conceptualization of accountability, which develops a more comprehensive understanding of this pervasive and imperative phenomenon. The meso model presented integrates contemporary theory and research, and extends our perspectives beyond individual, group, unit, or organizational perspectives toward a unitary whole. Following this is a description of challenges and opportunities facing scholars conducting accountability research (e.g., data collection and analysis and non-traditional conceptualizations of workplace phenomenon). Theoretical and practical implications are discussed, as are directions for future research.

The reputation has a significant impact on business, and it influences by causing an exponential positive or negative effect. There are many different issues that affect the level of reputation, and they are independent from the sector of the activity. If we focus on museums, previous studies mainly highlight the different strategies in order to manage and to increase their reputation. However, each research points out a specific aspect linked to the engagement, the use of digital technologies, or social media platforms. Our research aims to deep investigate the governance and leadership drivers in order to increase positive feeling within stakeholders also by using social media instruments. This research has indeed an exploratory nature as, to the best of our knowledge, no previous research focused on a similar strategy that characterizes for a “stellar” manager applied to a small museum in a small city.

The research uses a case study by observing the effects of selecting a well-known manager of the top ranked museum in the world (Louvre) in order to boost the reputation of a “startup” museum barely known (Pistoia Museums). After having analyzed the main drivers of reputation of the case, the study uses interview with the scientific director of the small museum.

The results contribute to the discussion about the drivers and the different strategies to boost reputation by showing how the management and leadership issues are able to increase it rapidly. However, findings also point out the need to have a clear overview about the digital tools applied to an adequate communication. The results show how the flexibility of a small growing museum can positively affect and boost reputation. This strategy can be applied to other small museums that aim to affirm their identity.

Online reputation manager has become increasingly important in tourism industry. Managers, regardless of working for a hospitality structure or a tourism destination, are paying more and more attention in respect of the importance of reputational levels. Online reputation, in fact, originates in visitor's user-generated contents (UGCs) but reverberates on the whole web, on successive visitors' attitude and behavior, and on managed organization performances. How to manage online reputation in tourism and destination management anyway mostly stayed an anecdotal topic for many years. While best practices exist, indeed, literature has frequently neglected their systematization. Building on this need, this book will try to improve and organize the existing body of knowledge on this topic to help future hotel and destination managers to better deal with the mounting environmental complexity.

Intangible assets and reputation play a considerable and complex role in acquisitions. Targets with better reputations are more attractive, yet may fetch a premium. Though the intangibles drive many transactions, the ability of an acquirer to leverage intangibles and reputation specifically after the transaction is more problematic. Two characteristics of reputation – mobility and transferability – are introduced to reflect the degree to which a target’s positive reputation may accrue to the buyer following an acquisition. Acquirer experience, hubris and cultural differences between acquirer and target may moderate the relationships between these characteristics of reputation and acquisition outcomes. Implications for practitioners are offered, including when acquiring firms should look for reputation capture vs. spillover, and when employee retention and internal communication should be the focus vs. integration and external communication.