Search results

1 – 10 of 10
Content available
Article
Publication date: 21 August 2017

Yen-Chun Jim Wu

1994

Abstract

Details

Management Decision, vol. 55 no. 7
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0025-1747

Content available
Article
Publication date: 20 January 2012

415

Abstract

Details

Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 17 no. 1
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1359-8546

Content available
Article
Publication date: 8 February 2011

462

Abstract

Details

Management Decision, vol. 49 no. 1
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0025-1747

Content available
Article
Publication date: 7 June 2013

Chad W. Autry and Judith M. Whipple

713

Abstract

Details

International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, vol. 43 no. 5/6
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0960-0035

Content available
Article
Publication date: 6 February 2009

2167

Abstract

Details

International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 29 no. 2
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0144-3577

Content available

Abstract

Details

Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 18 no. 4
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1359-8546

Content available
Article
Publication date: 7 April 2015

Haozhe Chen

1661

Abstract

Details

International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, vol. 45 no. 3
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0960-0035

Open Access
Article
Publication date: 30 June 2011

JunYeop Lee and Myunghun Lee

This paper examines the comparative corporate performance of logistics companies in Korea, China and Japan. Based on the annual data from the listed companies, the growth rate of…

Abstract

This paper examines the comparative corporate performance of logistics companies in Korea, China and Japan. Based on the annual data from the listed companies, the growth rate of Chinese companies has surpassed that of Korean and Japanese companies and has labeled China as the fastest growing economy. How ever, labor efficiency of Chinese firms when calculated by total revenue per employee is the lowest of the three countries. In addition, the profitability of Chinese multimodal logistics companies and sea transport companies is also lower than that of Korea and Japan.

Using Data Envelop Analysis(DEA), the primary results regarding corporate efficiency among Korean, Chinese and Japanese logistic companies are as follows: In the multimodal industries, Japanese firms have revealed the highest level of efficiency, with Korean firms coming in second, and Chinese firms ranking third with distinctly inferior performance. This trend has also been examined in the maritime industries, in which the efficiency levels have been deteriorating continuously. However, in the air transportation industry Chinese companies revealed the highest level of efficiency, which resulted from the business characteristics of the government supported conglomerate companies.

Details

Journal of International Logistics and Trade, vol. 9 no. 1
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1738-2122

Keywords

Content available
Article
Publication date: 1 September 2006

Zahir Irani and Omiros D. Sarikas

239

Abstract

Details

Journal of Enterprise Information Management, vol. 19 no. 5
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1741-0398

Content available
Article
Publication date: 16 November 2010

David Lamond and Rocky Dwyer

1349

Abstract

Details

Management Decision, vol. 48 no. 10
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0025-1747

Access

Only content I have access to

Year

Content type

1 – 10 of 10