Books and journals Case studies Expert Briefings Open Access
Advanced search

Search results

1 – 2 of 2
To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 December 2005

Equity or equality? a conceptual examination of the influence of individualism/collectivism on the cross‐cultural application of equity theory

Paul A. Fadil, Robert J. Williams, Wanthanee Limpaphayom and Cindi Smatt

Conceptually examines the effect of individualism/collectivism on the tenets of equity theory. It is the view of the authors that the equality principle of reward…

HTML
PDF (685 KB)

Abstract

Conceptually examines the effect of individualism/collectivism on the tenets of equity theory. It is the view of the authors that the equality principle of reward allocation in collectivistic cultures is not a separate method of distribution, but a subset of the theoretically grounded equity principle appropriately integrating the cross‐cultural individualism/collectivism value. To support this position, the authors reduce equity theory to its fundamental elements and illustrate how in dividualism/collectivism separately affects each component. The derived model and subsequent discussion should provide researchers with a theoretical frame work for future empirical studies.

Details

Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, vol. 12 no. 4
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600510798114
ISSN: 1352-7606

Keywords

  • Individualism
  • Collectivism
  • Equity theory

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 January 2006

Perceived differences in sexual harassment between business school students in the US and Thailand

Wanthanee Limpaphayom, Robert J. Williams and Paul A. Fadil

This study seeks to examine differences in the perceptions of sexual harassment between business school students in the USA and Thailand.

HTML
PDF (78 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

This study seeks to examine differences in the perceptions of sexual harassment between business school students in the USA and Thailand.

Design/methodology/approach

Senior‐level business students from both the USA (228 students) and Thailand (260 students) were surveyed regarding their perceptions of what constituted sexual harassment behaviour. After reading different workplace scenarios, the participants used a Likert‐type scale to rank different behaviours as to what they felt constituted sexual harassment. The survey scores were factor‐analyzed in order to determine the constructs underlying the variety of sexual harassment behaviours.

Findings

Students in the USA viewed sexual harassment as involving a quid quo pro situation in which one's behaviour affects the terms of employment (sexual coercion), and a hostile environment in which certain behaviours and remarks create a hostile or offensive work environment. In comparison, the Thai students also viewed behaviours that create a hostile or offensive environment as constituting harassment, but also considered sexually explicit language and jokes to be very offensive, and as constituting a form of sexual coercion.

Research limitations/implications

This study used only one data collection method, specifically, a survey instrument. Also, this study examined differences between US subjects and subjects from only one Far Eastern country. Thus, the results may not be generalizable to other East Asian countries.

Practical implications

As US businesses begin to expand into the Far East, it is imperative that we understand the nature of sexual harassment perceptions in these Far East countries.

Originality/value

This paper provides evidence that the perception of what constitutes sexual harassment varies across cultures.

Details

Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, vol. 13 no. 1
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600610643466
ISSN: 1352-7606

Keywords

  • Sexual harassment
  • Business schools
  • Students
  • Thailand
  • United States of America

Access
Only content I have access to
Only Open Access
Year
  • All dates (2)
Content type
  • Article (2)
1 – 2 of 2
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication sitemap

Policies and information

  • Privacy notice
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window
  • Chair of Trustees governance statement Opens in new window
  • COVID-19 policy Opens in new window
Manage cookies

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald Engage?

    You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here.
    You can also find out more about Emerald Engage.

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Questions & More Information

    Answers to the most commonly asked questions here