Search results

1 – 6 of 6
Content available
Article
Publication date: 16 January 2009

Tim Ratcliffe

637

Abstract

Details

Strategic Direction, vol. 25 no. 2
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0258-0543

Content available
Article
Publication date: 18 April 2008

Tim Ratcliffe

1015

Abstract

Details

Strategic Direction, vol. 24 no. 5
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0258-0543

Content available
Article
Publication date: 1 December 1998

Lawrie Hurst

104

Abstract

Details

Structural Survey, vol. 16 no. 4
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0263-080X

Keywords

Open Access
Article
Publication date: 22 November 2018

Peter Littlejohns, Katharina Kieslich, Albert Weale, Emma Tumilty, Georgina Richardson, Tim Stokes, Robin Gauld and Paul Scuffham

In order to create sustainable health systems, many countries are introducing ways to prioritise health services underpinned by a process of health technology assessment. While…

4386

Abstract

Purpose

In order to create sustainable health systems, many countries are introducing ways to prioritise health services underpinned by a process of health technology assessment. While this approach requires technical judgements of clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness, these are embedded in a wider set of social (societal) value judgements, including fairness, responsiveness to need, non-discrimination and obligations of accountability and transparency. Implementing controversial decisions faces legal, political and public challenge. To help generate acceptance for the need for health prioritisation and the resulting decisions, the purpose of this paper is to develop a novel way of encouraging key stakeholders, especially patients and the public, to become involved in the prioritisation process.

Design/methodology/approach

Through a multidisciplinary collaboration involving a series of international workshops, ethical and political theory (including accountability for reasonableness) have been applied to develop a practical way forward through the creation of a values framework. The authors have tested this framework in England and in New Zealand using a mixed-methods approach.

Findings

A social values framework that consists of content and process values has been developed and converted into an online decision-making audit tool.

Research limitations/implications

The authors have developed an easy to use method to help stakeholders (including the public) to understand the need for prioritisation of health services and to encourage their involvement. It provides a pragmatic way of harmonising different perspectives aimed at maximising health experience.

Practical implications

All health care systems are facing increasing demands within finite resources. Although many countries are introducing ways to prioritise health services, the decisions often face legal, political, commercial and ethical challenge. The research will help health systems to respond to these challenges.

Social implications

This study helps in increasing public involvement in complex health challenges.

Originality/value

No other groups have used this combination of approaches to address this issue.

Details

Journal of Health Organization and Management, vol. 33 no. 1
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1477-7266

Keywords

Content available
Article
Publication date: 1 December 2004

Stephen Brown and David Harrison

257

Abstract

Details

Property Management, vol. 22 no. 5
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0263-7472

Content available
Article
Publication date: 12 December 2016

Colin Dale

320

Abstract

Details

Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, vol. 7 no. 4
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 2050-8824

Access

Only content I have access to

Year

Content type

1 – 6 of 6