Books and journals Case studies Expert Briefings Open Access
Advanced search

Search results

1 – 10 of 60
To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 August 2005

Corporate behavior and strategy: When reputation counts

Reviews the latest management developments across the globe and pinpoints practical implications from cutting‐edge research and case studies.

HTML
PDF (179 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

Reviews the latest management developments across the globe and pinpoints practical implications from cutting‐edge research and case studies.

Design/methodology/approach

Scans the top 400 management publications in the world to identify the most topical issues and latest concepts. These are presented in an easy‐to‐digest briefing of no more than 1,500 words.

Findings

We're often told that a company's most valuable asset is its workforce. Few would argue with that. But with trust in large organizations sinking ever lower, then surely a good reputation comes a pretty close second. Indeed, in the aftermath of Enron, WorldCom and other high‐profile scandals, a good reputation has never been more important.

Practical implications

Provides strategic insights and practical thinking that have influenced some of the world's leading organizations.

Originality/value

The briefing saves busy executives and researchers hours of reading time by selecting only the very best, most pertinent information and presenting it in a condensed and easy‐to‐digest format.

Details

Strategic Direction, vol. 21 no. 8
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02580540510606684
ISSN: 0258-0543

Keywords

  • Social responsibility
  • Stakeholder analysis
  • Corporate image

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 22 March 2011

Sustainable procurement in the public sector: an international comparative study

Stephen Brammer and Helen Walker

Public bodies are being encouraged to procure sustainably, to reduce their social and environmental footprint and in order to stimulate sustainability in the private…

HTML
PDF (140 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

Public bodies are being encouraged to procure sustainably, to reduce their social and environmental footprint and in order to stimulate sustainability in the private sector. However, little is known about how public sector organisations internationally are responding to this encouragement or of the conditions that are most conducive to sustainable procurement (SP). The purpose of this paper is to address these gaps in our knowledge so as to inform policy development at the government and organisational levels.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors report the findings of a survey of SP practices within a sample of over 280 public procurement practitioners from 20 countries and with collective responsibility for expenditure totalling $45bn p.a.

Findings

The authors' analysis shows that some SP practices are evident in public sector procurement practice and that the extent and nature of SP practices varies significantly across regions. In addition, the authors highlight the main facilitators of, and barriers to, engagement with SP and investigate their importance for engagement with particular dimensions of SP.

Research limitations/implications

Survey respondents are volunteers and may to some degree be more interested in, or engaged with, SP than other public sector organisations. The analysis is cross‐sectional and therefore provides only a snapshot of SP practice in the public sector organisations studied.

Practical implications

The paper identifies how policy and practice in SP vary across regions, providing practical insights into whether and how government policies are being implemented around the world.

Originality/value

The paper provides the first systematic and comprehensive insight into how public bodies are implementing SP internationally and of the major situational factors that are shaping engagement with SP. The authors evaluate the current effectiveness of policy initiatives regarding SP and highlight the organisational catalysts and inhibitors of greater involvement in SP.

Details

International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 31 no. 4
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111119551
ISSN: 0144-3577

Keywords

  • Public procurement
  • Social responsibility

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 19 April 2013

An empirical examination of the relationship between business strategy and socially responsible supply chain management

Stefan Hoejmose, Stephen Brammer and Andrew Millington

This paper aims to explore the effect of business strategy on socially responsible supply chain management (SR‐SCM).

HTML
PDF (196 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to explore the effect of business strategy on socially responsible supply chain management (SR‐SCM).

Design/methodology/approach

This study draws on data from 178 UK‐based companies, and 340 buyer‐supplier relationships. A novel data collection approach is used, which minimizes social desirability and common methods bias, to capture socially responsible supply chain management. The data are analysed through a set of OLS regressions.

Findings

Business strategies significantly influence socially responsible supply chain management. Low‐cost producers largely neglect their social responsibilities in the supply chain. In contrast, firms pursuing differentiation strategies are considerably more engaged with these issues, partly because they have better supply chain processes.

Practical implications

Practitioners should carefully consider the fit between strategic position and level of engagement with SR‐SCM, since our results emphasise the relationship between SR‐SCM and business strategy. Proactive engagement with SR‐SCM, however, also implies sound supply chain processes, which must also be aligned with business strategy. Policy‐makers should consider the low engagement with SR‐SCM of low‐cost producers and the implications for SR‐SCM in cost sensitive and competitive global markets.

Originality/value

This is the first systematic cross‐sectional study of the relationship between business strategy and socially responsible supply chain management (SR‐SCM). These results suggest that there is a clear relationship between the strategic position of the firm and their SR‐SCM practices. These results contribute to the on‐going debate on relationships between strategy and supply chain management, and the emerging debate on the relationships between strategy and SR‐SCM.

Details

International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 33 no. 5
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571311322733
ISSN: 0144-3577

Keywords

  • Business strategy
  • Supply chain
  • Social responsibility
  • Supply chain management
  • United Kingdom

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 March 2014

Examining the relationship between the barriers and current practices of sustainable procurement: A survey of un organizations

Jacob Hasselbalch, Nives Costa and Alexander Blecken

This paper presents the results of a survey of perceptions on sustainable procurement (SP) in the United Nations (UN). It is the first of its kind to systematically…

HTML
PDF (164 KB)

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a survey of perceptions on sustainable procurement (SP) in the United Nations (UN). It is the first of its kind to systematically analyse the issue of SP in the UN system. While the UN has a tremendous opportunity to support their objective of sustainable development through SP practices, significant obstacles still block the full implementation of this goal. The purpose of this study is to investigate the barriers to implementing SP practices in the UN system. Based on an online survey that yielded 282 responses, we identified a framework of SP measures and barriers, and conducted a regression analysis to identify underlying correlations. We find significant correlation between good SP practices and low demand, performance measurement and tool barriers.

Details

Journal of Public Procurement, vol. 14 no. 3
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-14-03-2014-B003
ISSN: 1535-0118

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 13 March 2009

Sustainable procurement in the United Kingdom public sector

Helen Walker and Stephen Brammer

This study aims to investigate sustainable procurement in the UK public sector.

HTML
PDF (140 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to investigate sustainable procurement in the UK public sector.

Design/methodology/approach

Sustainable procurement is investigated using a questionnaire that draws on established scales for “purchasing social responsibility”. The survey was administered across the UK public sector, and 106 responses were received from procurement officers.

Findings

Analysis of quantitative and qualitative survey data reveal there is significant variation across public sector agencies in the nature of sustainable procurement practice. Local authorities have a particularly strong emphasis on buying from local and small suppliers relative to other sectors, health looks generally lower in many categories, and education appears to have something of an emphasis on environmental aspects of sustainable procurement. Cost has been found to be the leading barrier to sustainable procurement, and top management support the leading facilitator.

Research limitations/implications

There is likely to be selection bias in the sample, with those practitioners engaging in the sustainability agenda being more likely to have responded to the questionnaire. The United Kingdom government has an objective amongst the leaders in Europe on sustainable procurement by 2009, and early signs are encouraging that progress towards this goal is underway.

Originality/value

This paper provides the first survey of sustainable procurement practices across the UK public sector. It also provides a conceptual framework of influences upon the propensity to engage in sustainable procurement practice.

Details

Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 14 no. 2
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540910941993
ISSN: 1359-8546

Keywords

  • Public procurement
  • Public sector organizations
  • United Kingdom

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 7 March 2008

Environmental management in the United Kingdom: new survey evidence

Frederik Dahlmann, Stephen Brammer and Andrew Millington

The purpose of this paper is to provide a snapshot of environmental management practices in the UK and discuss managerial responses to environmental issues in comparison…

HTML
PDF (112 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to provide a snapshot of environmental management practices in the UK and discuss managerial responses to environmental issues in comparison with earlier research.

Design/methodology/approach

A telephone interview survey approach is adopted encompassing both quantitative and qualitative open‐ended questions with a sample of 167 UK companies stratified by firm size and industry sector.

Findings

The majority of firms are undertaking efforts to reduce their environmental impacts, yet economic considerations such as cost and risk reductions and achieving compliance with environmental legislation dominate firms' environmental behaviour. Especially small and medium‐sized firms appear to rely on relatively short‐term planning horizons, which ultimately prevent them from becoming more proactive in their environmental outlook. Comparison with earlier studies suggests that the overall behaviour of firms towards environmental issues remains reactive and economically‐oriented.

Research limitations/implications

Despite the growing salience of many environmental challenges, businesses fail to employ more proactive environmental strategies, suggesting that more has to be done at policy level to stimulate the incentives involved with adopting such an approach.

Originality/value

By using a mixed methods approach the paper aims to overcome problems of respondent identification and social desirability bias.

Details

Management Decision, vol. 46 no. 2
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740810854159
ISSN: 0025-1747

Keywords

  • Environmental management
  • Stakeholders
  • Legislation

Content available
Article
Publication date: 6 February 2017

Personnel reviewers 2016

HTML
PDF (113 KB)

Abstract

Details

Personnel Review, vol. 46 no. 1
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2017-331
ISSN: 0048-3486

Content available
Article
Publication date: 13 March 2009

Introduction

Adam Lindgreen, Francois Maon and Valerie Swaen

HTML

Abstract

Details

Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 14 no. 2
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/scm.2009.17714baa.001
ISSN: 1359-8546

Content available
Article
Publication date: 4 January 2013

2012 Awards for Excellence

HTML

Abstract

Details

International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 33 no. 1
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm.2013.02433aaa.002
ISSN: 0144-3577

Keywords

  • Public procurement
  • Social responsibility

Content available
Book part
Publication date: 23 June 2020

Prelims

Debbie Haski-Leventhal

Free Access
HTML
PDF (319 KB)
EPUB (3.6 MB)

Abstract

Details

The Purpose-Driven University
Type: Book
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83867-283-620201001
ISBN: 978-1-83867-283-6

Access
Only content I have access to
Only Open Access
Year
  • Last 3 months (4)
  • Last 6 months (4)
  • Last 12 months (7)
  • All dates (60)
Content type
  • Article (48)
  • Book part (8)
  • Earlycite article (4)
1 – 10 of 60
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication sitemap

Policies and information

  • Privacy notice
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window
  • Chair of Trustees governance statement Opens in new window
  • COVID-19 policy Opens in new window
Manage cookies

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald Engage?

    You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here.
    You can also find out more about Emerald Engage.

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Questions & More Information

    Answers to the most commonly asked questions here