Search results
1 – 3 of 3Muhammad Munir Ahmad, Ahmed Imran Hunjra, Faridul Islam and Qasim Zureigat
The authors examine the impact of asymmetric information on firm's financing decisions, the feedback effect of changes in capital structure on the level of asymmetric information…
Abstract
Purpose
The authors examine the impact of asymmetric information on firm's financing decisions, the feedback effect of changes in capital structure on the level of asymmetric information, and the speed of adjustments in capital structure on its target leverage.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors extract the data on 280 non-financial firms listed in the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) from the DataStream. The authors implement the generalized method of moments (GMM), complemented by the fixed effect model (FEM) to estimate the model coefficients.
Findings
The authors find that asymmetric information significantly affects the financing decisions; and that on average, firms adjust 26% of the total debt toward their target capital structure. The negative effect from the difference between the observed and target changes in leverage on asymmetric information confirms that capital structure changes act as a signal for future profitability and helps the management to lower its level of asymmetric information.
Originality/value
The findings offer fresh insight into the effect of asymmetric information on financing decisions, as well as the speed of adjustment of capital structure toward its target leverage, in the context of the firms working in emerging markets like Pakistan. To the authors’ best knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the impact of asymmetric information on financing decisions that incorporate firm's age, size and the global financial crises 2007–2008. The authors construct an asymmetric information index using both accounting and finance measures of asymmetry.
Details
Keywords
Lina Fuad Hussien, Nahed Habis Alrawashedh, Anan Deek, Khaled Alshaketheep, Omar Zraqat, Hasan Khaled Al-Awamleh and Qasim Zureigat
The energy sector is one of the most important sectors with an impact on the environment, and therefore, sustainable performance in this sector is considered a sensitive issue for…
Abstract
Purpose
The energy sector is one of the most important sectors with an impact on the environment, and therefore, sustainable performance in this sector is considered a sensitive issue for sustainability. It is, therefore, necessary to know how to address stakeholders’ interest in sustainability through governance mechanisms. The purpose of this study is to look into the role of corporate governance (CG) on sustainable performance disclosure (SPD) in the energy sector.
Design/methodology/approach
This study uses panel data covering the period 2019–2023 among 12 companies in the energy sector in Jordan. Fixed-effect regression models were estimated for board size, board independence, chief executive officer (CEO) duality, board diligence, board gender diversity, sustainability committee existence and sustainability disclosure. The data analysis tool of choice was a multiple regression approach because it was deemed appropriate. The disclosure index was created using global reporting initiative standards and provides the number and quality of disclosures on key sustainability indicators.
Findings
The study found a significant and positive relationship between board size, percentage of independent directors, board audit, board gender diversity, existence of sustainability committee and level of SPD. On the other hand, the study establishes that CEO duality has an inverse relationship with SPD.
Practical implications
The findings of this study have significant implications for managers and corporate decision-makers in the energy sector. The findings affirm that the improved design of CG motivations and realizations conducive to robust measures of SPD necessitates effective CG.
Originality/value
The value of this applied study stems from the importance of SPD for various categories of stakeholders, and conducting such an applied study is crucial to improving the existing realization of the factors that can have a significant impact on the level of SPD in Jordanian energy sector companies. The results of this paper may be of procedural value to regulatory authorities and decision-makers.
Details
Keywords
Malek Hamed Alshirah, Azhar Abdul Rahman and Ifa Rizad Mustapa
This study aims at examining the level of risk of disclosure practices and the effect of four board of directors' characteristics (board size, board meetings, CEO duality and…
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims at examining the level of risk of disclosure practices and the effect of four board of directors' characteristics (board size, board meetings, CEO duality and board expertise) on these practices in the Jordanian context. This study also adds to the body of literature by examining the moderating effect of family ownership on the relationship between the board of directors' characteristics and the corporate risk disclosure.
Design/methodology/approach
The sample of this study contains the non-financial Jordanian firms listed on Amman Stock Exchange (ASE). 376 annual reports of the sampled firms over four years from 2014 to 2017 were used. The content analysis approach was used to collect data and to determine the level of risk disclosure by computing the number of risk-related sentences in the annual reporting. To test the study's hypothesis, the random effect model was employed.
Findings
The empirical results show that the total of the risk disclosure sentences for each firm ranges from a minimum value of 2 sentences to a maximum value of 61 sentences, and the mean of CRD is 28 sentences. The results also indicate that the board expertise is positively related with the level of risk disclosure. Conversely, CEO duality has a negative impact on the risk disclosure practices. However, the results failed to support that the board size and the board meetings have a significant effect on the level of risk disclosure. Furthermore, the study demonstrated that the family ownership moderates the relationship between the board of directors and the corporate risk disclosure.
Practical implications
The finding of this study is more likely be useful for many concerned parties, researchers, authorities, investors and financial analysts alike in understanding the current practices of the risk disclosure in Jordan, thus helping them in reconsidering and reviewing the accounting standards and improving the credibility and transparency of the financial reports in the Jordanian capital market.
Originality/value
The current study contributes to the literature of risk disclosure because the previous research has paid little attention to this topic in Jordan. To the best knowledge of the researcher, this study is the first Jordanian study that focuses on examining the relationship between the board of directors' characteristics and the corporate risk disclosure in the non-financial sector. Furthermore, it is the first study that examines the moderating role of family ownership on such relationships. Consequently, the results of the current study draw attention to the CRD practices and the monitoring role of board of directors in Jordan.
Details