Search results
1 – 3 of 3Kirill Rozhkov, Konstantin Khomutskii, Robert Romanowski and Norberto Muniz-Martinez
This paper aims to present concepts and tools for developing place branding that protects places from overbranding, redundant promotion and excessive tourism.
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to present concepts and tools for developing place branding that protects places from overbranding, redundant promotion and excessive tourism.
Design/methodology/approach
The concept of a product-based place brand that reflects local ways of life and local identities was introduced. A combination of projective, typological and narrative methods was applied. Three focus groups composed of future place managers were held in three countries (N = 27) to develop place brand vocabularies and typologies of verbal characteristics of abstract places as products for internal users (residents).
Findings
In most cases, the place brand vocabularies were consistent and compatible within each abstract type and were unique (mutually exclusive) between the types. The vocabularies contained both detailed and more generalized elements. For each place, short formulations of the general concept were found. Each brand vocabulary reflected the institutional, socio-psychological, cultural, historical and geographic differences of the countries involved in the research.
Originality/value
A conceptual and methodological framework for creating place brand vocabularies is offered, and it describes the close relationship between multiple internal brand attributes and their concise expressions appropriate for communication and high differentiation among brand attributes that facilitate the recognition of branded places by target and non-target audiences. The framework is applicable for designing verbal attributes of place brands for specific places to avoid overbranding effects.
Details
Keywords
Reviews the latest management developments across the globe and pinpoints practical implications from cutting‐edge research and case studies.
Abstract
Purpose
Reviews the latest management developments across the globe and pinpoints practical implications from cutting‐edge research and case studies.
Design/methodology/approach
This briefing is prepared by an independent writer who adds their own impartial comments and places the articles in context.
Findings
An old saying warns us not to judge a book by its cover. When it comes to business organizations, however, that's precisely what many of us do. Consequently, brand image means almost everything and to a considerable extent influences what choices we make as consumers. It's hardly surprising, therefore, that companies routinely spend small fortunes on their marketing strategies. Cultivate an attractive brand image, target the right consumer groups and it's happy ever afters all round.
Practical implications
Provides strategic insights and practical thinking that have influenced some of the world's leading organizations.
Originality/value
The briefing saves busy executives and researchers hours of reading time by selecting only the very best, most pertinent information and presenting it in a condensed and easy‐to‐digest format.
Details
Keywords
Amélia Brandão, Jose Carlos C. Sousa and Clarinda Rodrigues
This paper aims to propose a dynamic and holistic framework that combines the brand portfolio audit with the brand architecture redesign.
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to propose a dynamic and holistic framework that combines the brand portfolio audit with the brand architecture redesign.
Design/methodology/approach
Depicting from an extensive review on the frameworks of brand audit and brand architecture, a dynamic approach to brand portfolio audit and brand architecture strategy was developed, and later applied and tested in three B2B and B2C companies.
Findings
The paper suggests an eight-step framework to guide practitioners when auditing a specific brand portfolio and designing a revised brand architecture strategy. Additionally, a Brand Audit Scorecard was developed to enable and sustain brand portfolio audits, divided into three dimensions (brand equity, brand contribution and strategic options).
Research limitations/implications
Further research should aim at testing the proposed framework in different types of companies and countries.
Originality/value
This paper contributes to the brand audit and brand architecture literature by proposing a holistic framework that is not static.
Details