Books and journals Case studies Expert Briefings Open Access
Advanced search

Search results

1 – 3 of 3
To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 May 2015

Contracts, relationships and innovation in business-to-business exchanges

Monika Maria Möhring and John Finch

This paper aims to contrast two approaches to the study of contracts in business and industrial marketing: first, as a legal document in shaping at the outset exchanges…

HTML
PDF (134 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to contrast two approaches to the study of contracts in business and industrial marketing: first, as a legal document in shaping at the outset exchanges and interactions, for instance in projects; and second, as relational norms in becoming integrated into a business relationship through interactions, for instance as a resource.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper draws on cross-case comparison of three projects, as actors develop an engineering service for optimizing the maintenance of large-scale capital equipment by analyzing real-time data from sensors and user records. Comparison is by coding interview and observational data as micro-sequences of interactions among actors.

Findings

Preparing contracts allows a project to commence and is an early form of interaction, intensifying new relationships or cutting into and recasting established ones. Relational norms augment and can supersede the early focus on the contract, thus incorporating incremental innovation and absorbing some uncertainties.

Research limitations/implications

The research approach benefits from detailed comparison and captures some variety across its three cases, but the discussion is limited to theoretical generalization.

Practical implications

The analysis and discussion highlights and focuses on when different approaches to understanding contracting are more apparent across durable business relationships. Transitions from a contractual document to a view of relational norms are subtle, vulnerable and not always made successfully.

Originality/value

This paper’s originality is in it comparison of overlapping approaches to understanding businesses’ uses of contacts in business and industrial marketing, of contract and relational norms. It develops a valuable research proposition, in the transition from a mainly contractual to a mainly relational uses of contracts, thus identifying contract as a particular business resource, to be deployed and embedded.

Details

Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, vol. 30 no. 3/4
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-12-2012-0249
ISSN: 0885-8624

Keywords

  • Innovation
  • Interaction
  • Relationship
  • Contract
  • Engineering services

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 February 2002

Gender and subject decision at university. Gender specificity in subject perception and decision with main emphasis on science and technology

Birgit blättel‐Mink

States that the participation of men and women in the German academic and scientific system is unequally distributed. Shows that the higher the status at the university…

HTML
PDF (103 KB)

Abstract

States that the participation of men and women in the German academic and scientific system is unequally distributed. Shows that the higher the status at the university, the lower the female proportion and that women also choose different subjects to men. Asks why more men choose science and engineering and what social cognitive characteristics do women show who opt for a “male” subject. Presents the theoretical background to the above before providing some insights using surveys carried out in Germany.

Details

Equal Opportunities International, vol. 21 no. 1
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02610150210787055
ISSN: 0261-0159

Keywords

  • Gender
  • Universities
  • Germany
  • Science

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 3 September 2018

Does a high women quota in supervisory boards influence firm success?

Bettina C.K. Binder

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between the success of the 50 EURO STOXX companies as measured by the earnings before taxes (EBT) and the…

HTML
PDF (1 MB)

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between the success of the 50 EURO STOXX companies as measured by the earnings before taxes (EBT) and the percentage of female members on their supervisory boards.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper relies on data extracted from the annual reports of the 50 EURO STOXX companies in 2015 and from financial websites.

Findings

The paper provides the existence of a weak correlation between companies’ performance as measured by EBT and the percentage of women on supervisory boards.

Research limitations/implications

This study has two main limitations: first, a single key performance indicator was used to measure firms’ success; and second, the study offers insights related only to the year 2015. The analysis could be extended over a larger time span while some other variables could be considered in a more holistic approach.

Practical implications

The paper raises awareness that there is much to be done with regard to the presence of women on boards, and readers, investors and business owners gain an insight on the business environment and women active on European corporate boards.

Originality/value

By concentrating on the companies of the EURO STOXX 50 Index, the study offers a good image of the European business environment.

Details

EuroMed Journal of Business, vol. 13 no. 3
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-02-2018-0011
ISSN: 1450-2194

Keywords

  • Firm performance
  • Key performance indicators
  • Earnings before taxes
  • EURO STOXX 50
  • Gender quota
  • Women on corporate boards

Access
Only content I have access to
Only Open Access
Year
  • All dates (3)
Content type
  • Article (3)
1 – 3 of 3
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication sitemap

Policies and information

  • Privacy notice
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window
  • Chair of Trustees governance statement Opens in new window
  • COVID-19 policy Opens in new window
Manage cookies

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald Engage?

    You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here.
    You can also find out more about Emerald Engage.

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Questions & More Information

    Answers to the most commonly asked questions here