Books and journals Case studies Expert Briefings Open Access
Advanced search

Search results

1 – 3 of 3
To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 May 1998

Relationship dissolution model: antecedents of relationship commitment and the likelihood of dissolving a relationship

Mary Ann Hocutt

A relationship dissolution model is developed that depicts some of the key antecedents of relationship commitment as revealed in the context of the dissolution of a…

HTML
PDF (100 KB)

Abstract

A relationship dissolution model is developed that depicts some of the key antecedents of relationship commitment as revealed in the context of the dissolution of a buyer‐seller relationship. Despite the importance of the dissolution of marketing relationships, there has been little research on this topic. The level of commitment determines intentions to remain in the relationship. However, it is difficult to measure true commitment in a relationship until that relationship ends. In addition to adding to our knowledge about the dissolution of marketing relationships, this paper will also provide a new conceptual representation of the relationship commitment construct.

Details

International Journal of Service Industry Management, vol. 9 no. 2
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239810210541
ISSN: 0956-4233

Keywords

  • Channel relationships
  • Relationship marketing

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 April 2006

The art of service recovery: fact or fiction?

Mary Ann Hocutt, Michael R. Bowers and D. Todd Donavan

To determine the impact of service recovery on consumer evaluations of service delivery.

HTML
PDF (139 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the impact of service recovery on consumer evaluations of service delivery.

Design/methodology/approach

An experiment investigated consumer responses to three dimensions of perceived fairness of recovery efforts: redress, responsiveness, and empathy/courtesy.

Findings

Results revealed that higher levels of redress independently increase positive consumer responses. It was further found that the interaction of employee responsiveness and courtesy can also have a dramatic impact on consumer evaluations. Satisfaction was highest and negative word‐of‐mouth (WOM) intentions were lowest only under conditions of high responsiveness and courtesy. Additionally, an interaction between courtesy and tangible rewards significantly decreased the level of negative WOM.

Practical implications

The research offers empirical support for the “service recovery paradox” suggesting effective post‐recovery efforts may not only counteract bad service experiences, but may increase satisfaction beyond levels held before the service failure.

Originality/value

Key elements for the proper structuring of a service recovery process are identified for management.

Details

Journal of Services Marketing, vol. 20 no. 3
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040610665652
ISSN: 0887-6045

Keywords

  • Customer satisfaction
  • Service failures
  • Customer service management

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 2 August 2011

An examination of consumer advocacy and complaining behavior in the context of service failure

Piotr Chelminski and Robin A. Coulter

This paper aims to examine the relationships between consumer advocacy and consumer complaining behaviors such as voicing and negative word‐of‐mouth in the context of…

HTML
PDF (159 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to examine the relationships between consumer advocacy and consumer complaining behaviors such as voicing and negative word‐of‐mouth in the context of dissatisfactory service experiences.

Design/methodology/approach

Using an experimental design embedded in a survey methodology, the authors examine the relationship between consumer advocacy and the likelihood for complaining about dissatisfactory service experiences among adult US consumers. Additionally, the authors examine the differences between likelihood for voicing and negative word‐of‐mouth (NWOM) in the context of dissatisfactory service experiences at varying levels of service encounter failure.

Findings

The authors find that consumer advocacy is positively related to consumer complaining (i.e. voicing and NWOM), and that likelihood of NWOM is consistently greater than likelihood of voicing.

Research limitations/implications

This study uses a convenience sample of US adult consumers, which could compromise generalizability of the results to broader consumer populations.

Practical implications

Based on these results, the authors suggest that companies and consumer protection agencies appeal to consumers' advocacy tendencies to facilitate voicing so problems can be quickly identified and resolved, and the negative word‐of‐mouth can be minimized.

Originality/value

This study is the first attempt known to authors to link consumer advocacy to complaining behaviors in the marketplace.

Details

Journal of Services Marketing, vol. 25 no. 5
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041111149711
ISSN: 0887-6045

Keywords

  • Consumer advocacy
  • Service encounter failure
  • Consumer voicing
  • Negative word‐of‐mouth
  • Consumer behaviour
  • Complaints

Access
Only content I have access to
Only Open Access
Year
  • All dates (3)
Content type
  • Article (3)
1 – 3 of 3
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication sitemap

Policies and information

  • Privacy notice
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window
  • Chair of Trustees governance statement Opens in new window
  • COVID-19 policy Opens in new window
Manage cookies

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald Engage?

    You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here.
    You can also find out more about Emerald Engage.

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Questions & More Information

    Answers to the most commonly asked questions here