Search results

1 – 3 of 3
Article
Publication date: 14 October 2020

Martijn J. van den Assem, Dennie van Dolder, Remco C.J. Zwinkels and Marc B.J. Schauten

This paper documents a strong violation of the law of one price surrounding a large rights issue.

Abstract

Purpose

This paper documents a strong violation of the law of one price surrounding a large rights issue.

Design/methodology/approach

If prices are right, the relation between the prices of shares and rights follows the outcome of a simple calculation.

Findings

In the case of Royal Imtech N.V. in 2014, prices deviated sharply and persistently from the theoretical prediction. Throughout the term of the rights, investors were buying shares at prices that were many times what they should have been given the price of the rights. Short-selling constraints in the form of high recall risk and lacking stock lending supply are the most likely explanation for the failure of arbitrage as a safeguard of market efficiency. Still, it remains remarkable that investors were buying large volumes of shares at highly inflated prices in the presence of a cheap, perfect substitute.

Originality/value

The mispricing was special not just because of its severity but also because unlike previously documented cases there was no fundamental risk and no material noise trader risk.

Details

Review of Behavioral Finance, vol. 14 no. 1
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1940-5979

Keywords

Article
Publication date: 10 August 2010

Marc Schauten, Rudolf Stegink and Gijs de Graaff

The purpose of this paper is to determine the required return of intangible assets for eight different business sectors by means of an empirical study of companies from…

3741

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to determine the required return of intangible assets for eight different business sectors by means of an empirical study of companies from the US Standard & Poor's 500 index. The resulting required return is subsequently compared with proxies for the required return on intangible assets used in practice, such as the weighted average cost of capital (WACC).

Design/methodology/approach

To determine the discount rate of the intangible assets the paper applies the weighted average return on assets method (weighted average return on assets (WARA) method). The paper finds the return on intangible assets (RIA) by setting the WARA equal to the WACC and solves the equation for RIA.

Findings

For all the identified sectors, the RIA is higher than the WACC. It is also shown that this return is higher than the levered or unlevered cost of equity of the company as a whole. In six of the eight sectors, the levered cost of equity appears to be the best proxy for the required return on intangible assets.

Practical implications

The paper shows how the required return on intangible assets can be estimated. The required return is needed for discounted cash flow valuations of intangible assets.

Originality/value

This paper adjusts the WARA method applied by Smith and Parr. In contrast to Smith and Parr, the tax shield is included as a separate asset in the model. Consequently, the WACC before tax is used instead of the WACC after tax.

Details

Managerial Finance, vol. 36 no. 9
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0307-4358

Keywords

Content available
Article
Publication date: 10 August 2010

Tyrone M. Carlin and Nigel Finch

1748

Abstract

Details

Managerial Finance, vol. 36 no. 9
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0307-4358

1 – 3 of 3