Search results

1 – 1 of 1
To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 22 February 2008

Ylva Gavel and Lars Iselid

The purpose of this research is to provide the scientific community with some quantitative data of relevance to the evaluation of two major citation databases. In…

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this research is to provide the scientific community with some quantitative data of relevance to the evaluation of two major citation databases. In addition, various aspects of the methodology of database coverage comparisons are discussed.

Design/methodology/approach

Calculations of the overlaps between the journal lists of Web of Science and Scopus and some other major scientific databases are presented.

Findings

The results provide some measures of the overall title coverage as well as the amount of unique material in the sources studied.

Research limitations/implications

The journal title overlap calculations are based on journal lists provided by the database producers rather than searches in the databases themselves. Any inaccuracies in the lists may be reflected in the results. Also, the lists do not provide any information about the depth and consistency of the coverage. The nature of possible error sources is discussed.

Originality/value

The methodology chosen allows comparatively quick comparisons between the contents of databases. This makes it suitable for analysis of trends in database coverage.

Details

Online Information Review, vol. 32 no. 1
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1468-4527

Keywords

1 – 1 of 1