Search results

March 14, 1968 Building — Safety regulations — Application — Painters engaged in cleaning and dusting prior to painting — Fall from unlashed ladder — Breach of regulation 29(4), if regulations applicable — Whether dusting included in operation of “redecoration” — Building (Safety, Health and Welfare) Regulations, 1948 (S.I. 1948, No.1145), reg.2(1).

The original legislation which introduced the redundancy payments scheme was the Redundancy Payments Act 1965. This was the first of the substantive statutory individual employment rights given to an employee; other individual employment rights, as for example, the right not to be unfairly dismissed, followed some years later. The Redundancy Payments Act 1965 has been repealed and the provisions on redundancy are now to be found in the Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act 1978.

February 28, 1968 Factory — Lighting — “Sufficient and suitable” — Effective lighting provided — Lighting not switched on — Whether breach of statutory duty — Roadway 30 feet wide — Whether “passage” or “gangway” — Factories Act, 1961 (9 & 10 Eliz.II, c.34), ss.5(1), 28(1).

July 30, 1970 Trade union — Membership — Breach of contract by wrongful termination — Measure of damages — Actual loss to date of assessment — Future loss, how estimated? — Duty to mitigate — Union rules giving arbitrary power over temporary members — Effect on man's right to work — Whether invalid.

March 26; 1971 Negligence — Master and servant — Press operator — Scrap material lying on floor near press — Whether satisfactory system for removing scraps from floor.

December 19, 1969 Redundancy — Dismissal — Employer's work in one place terminating — Invitation to employees to move to new factory — Employees declining to work elsewhere — Terms of offer — Whether repudiation of contracts by employer — Whether employees entitled to terminate contracts — Whether employees “dismissed” — Redundancy Payments Act, 1965 (c.62), ss. 1, 3(1)(a),(c).

March 12, 1968 Factory — “Lifting machine” — Push button control — Workman operating crane thereby, ruptured thumb — Stiff buttons assumed to be faulty control — Stiffness caused by fault in electrical circuit — Whether part of lifting machine — Factories Act, 1961 (9 & 10 Eliz.II,c.34), s.27(1).

In order to succeed in an action under the Equal Pay Act 1970, should the woman and the man be employed by the same employer on like work at the same time or would the woman still be covered by the Act if she were employed on like work in succession to the man? This is the question which had to be solved in Macarthys Ltd v. Smith. Unfortunately it was not. Their Lordships interpreted the relevant section in different ways and since Article 119 of the Treaty of Rome was also subject to different interpretations, the case has been referred to the European Court of Justice.