Search results

1 – 10 of over 1000
To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 January 1975

Knight's Industrial Law Reports goes into a new style and format as Managerial Law This issue of KILR is restyled Managerial Law and it now appears on a continuous…

Abstract

Knight's Industrial Law Reports goes into a new style and format as Managerial Law This issue of KILR is restyled Managerial Law and it now appears on a continuous updating basis rather than as a monthly routine affair.

Details

Managerial Law, vol. 18 no. 1
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0309-0558

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 November 1973

Edmund Davies, L.J. Stamp and L.J. Stephenson

July 6, 1973 Factories — Eyes — Protective equipment — Whether “suitable” goggles “provided” — Whether compliance with statutory duty excludes employers' common law duty…

Abstract

July 6, 1973 Factories — Eyes — Protective equipment — Whether “suitable” goggles “provided” — Whether compliance with statutory duty excludes employers' common law duty of care — Duty of employers at common law — Non‐Ferrous Metals (Melting and Founding) Regulations, 1962 (S.I. 1962 No. 1667) reg. 13(1) (c),(4).

Details

Managerial Law, vol. 15 no. 2
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0309-0558

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 May 1988

Jo Carby‐Hall

In the previous monograph, a discussion took place on what constitutes dismissal and when the termination of the contract of employment takes effect. These two aspects…

Abstract

In the previous monograph, a discussion took place on what constitutes dismissal and when the termination of the contract of employment takes effect. These two aspects treat the first of the statutory qualifications necessary to enable the employee to exercise his right not to be unfairly dismissed, namely that he must first be dismissed.

Details

Managerial Law, vol. 30 no. 5
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0309-0558

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 November 1972

L.J. Davies, L.J. Karminski and L.J. Stephenson

April 18, 1972 Negligence — Contributory negligence — Damages — Apportionment — Plaintiffs minor contributory negligence — Whether to be disregarded — Law Reform…

Abstract

April 18, 1972 Negligence — Contributory negligence — Damages — Apportionment — Plaintiffs minor contributory negligence — Whether to be disregarded — Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act, 1945 (8, 9 & 10 Geo. VI, c. 28) s. 1(1).

Details

Managerial Law, vol. 13 no. 2
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0309-0558

To view the access options for this content please click here
Book part
Publication date: 11 July 2019

Tanya Fitzgerald and Sally Knipe

Abstract

Details

Historical Perspectives on Teacher Preparation in Aotearoa New Zealand
Type: Book
ISBN: 978-1-78754-640-0

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 March 1973

L.J. Russell, L.J. Stamp and L.J. Stephenson

November 23, 1972 Master and Servant — Breach of statutory duty — Mine — Management's duty to ensure suitable appliances “readily available” — Supplies available between…

Abstract

November 23, 1972 Master and Servant — Breach of statutory duty — Mine — Management's duty to ensure suitable appliances “readily available” — Supplies available between shifts at colliery stores — Need for tool at coal face during shift — Whether system complying with regulation — Coal and Other Mines (Managers and Officials) Regulations, 1956 (S.I. 1956 No. 1758), reg. 2.

Details

Managerial Law, vol. 13 no. 6
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0309-0558

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 February 1986

J.R. Carby‐Hall

Since their creation through the Industrial Training Act 1964 to hear appeals against levies, the jurisdiction of industrial tribunals has grown considerably. One aspect…

Abstract

Since their creation through the Industrial Training Act 1964 to hear appeals against levies, the jurisdiction of industrial tribunals has grown considerably. One aspect of this jurisdiction, unfair dismissal, is examined here. Basic principles related to the law of unfair dismissal are examined. The practice and procedure of an industrial tribunal solely in connection with unfair dismissal cases are examined in greater detail. A case study is used to illustrate the important aspects of procedure. Appendices give relevant forms and extracts from the appropriate Code of Practice.

Details

Managerial Law, vol. 28 no. 2
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0309-0558

Keywords

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 June 1986

J.R. Carby‐Hall

The purpose of this monograph is to examine the various ways in which the contract of employment may be terminated at common law other than by the common law of wrongful…

Abstract

The purpose of this monograph is to examine the various ways in which the contract of employment may be terminated at common law other than by the common law of wrongful dismissal or statutory unfair dismissal and redundancy. Wrongful dismissal has already been discussed in another monograph and unfair dismissal and redundancy will feature in a subsequent one.

Details

Managerial Law, vol. 28 no. 6
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0309-0558

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 January 1976

The Howard Shuttering Contractors case throws considerable light on the importance which the tribunals attach to warnings before dismissing an employee. In this case the…

Abstract

The Howard Shuttering Contractors case throws considerable light on the importance which the tribunals attach to warnings before dismissing an employee. In this case the tribunal took great pains to interpret the intention of the parties to the different site agreements, and it came to the conclusion that the agreed procedure was not followed. One other matter, which must be particularly noted by employers, is that where a final warning is required, this final warning must be “a warning”, and not the actual dismissal. So that where, for example, three warnings are to be given, the third must be a “warning”. It is after the employee has misconducted himself thereafter that the employer may dismiss.

Details

Managerial Law, vol. 19 no. 1
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0309-0558

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 December 2002

Jo Carby‐Hall

Discusses the long existing and confusing problems of establishing the relationship of who is, and who if not, a dependent worker. Reflects developments which have…

Abstract

Discusses the long existing and confusing problems of establishing the relationship of who is, and who if not, a dependent worker. Reflects developments which have occurred in British law as it affects the employment field, plus an evaluation and analysis of some of the different types of employment relationships which have evolved by examining, where possible, the status of each of these relationships. Concludes that the typical worker nowadays finds himself in a vulnerable position both economically and psychologically owing to the insecurity which exists.

Details

Managerial Law, vol. 44 no. 6
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0309-0558

Keywords

1 – 10 of over 1000