Search results

1 – 2 of 2
To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 April 1991

Kenneth W. Stikkers

Mainstream economics has long prided itself to be an empirical “science”, at least in aspiration if not yet in practice. Yet, some of the most elementary, commonplace…

Abstract

Mainstream economics has long prided itself to be an empirical “science”, at least in aspiration if not yet in practice. Yet, some of the most elementary, commonplace premises of the discipline are flatly contradicted by the empirical findings of cultural anthropology. Karl Polanyi made this point:

Details

Humanomics, vol. 7 no. 4
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0828-8666

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 5 August 2014

Kenneth W. Stikkers

– This paper aims to explain how economics severed itself from the moral constraint of community and from ethics.

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to explain how economics severed itself from the moral constraint of community and from ethics.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper utilizes respected economic histories (e.g. Tawney, Polanyi, Heilbroner) and analyzes central theoretical texts of modern capitalism (e.g. Adam Smith).

Findings

This paper concludes that the divorce of economics from community and ethics had historical causes, beginning with enclosure, and was then theoretically justified by the classical economics.

Practical implications

The paper suggests that, if social economics wish to reconnect economics with ethics, they need first to understand and to contend with, better than they have, the enormity of the historical and theoretical forces that drove the two apart in the first place.

Originality/value

While many social economists argue for the need to connect economics with ethics, few if any have offered an extended analysis of their divorce.

Details

Humanomics, vol. 30 no. 3
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0828-8666

Keywords

1 – 2 of 2