Search results
1 – 10 of 53John Holford, Marcella Milana and Palle Rasmussen
This chapter outlines key areas of literature and policy that have influenced or affected our research on the comparative study of adult education. Policy influences include the…
Abstract
This chapter outlines key areas of literature and policy that have influenced or affected our research on the comparative study of adult education. Policy influences include the growth of lifelong learning within a neoliberal framing since the 1990s and the rise of ‘evidence-based’ approaches with a narrow reliance on quantitative data. Much of our work has been inspired by the need to critique these trends, adopt broader approaches to lifelong learning and defend the more democratic traditions of adult education. Important areas of theoretical inspiration, many of which interrogate these policy developments, are also outlined. The critical reinterpretation of historical adult education practices is another important area of work and inspiration. In relation to sustainability, we have been influenced particularly by the capabilities approach.
Details
Keywords
Julia Lane, Javier Miranda, James Spletzer and Simon Burgess
Rich DeJordy, Brad Almond, Richard Nielsen and W. E. Douglas Creed
In this article, we use the case of religious research universities to explore the presence of multiple institutional logics with the potential for contradiction and conflict. In…
Abstract
In this article, we use the case of religious research universities to explore the presence of multiple institutional logics with the potential for contradiction and conflict. In particular, building on existing research on conflicting institutional logics, we assess the most common forms of resolution (replacement, dominant logic, decoupling, compartmentalization, and coexistence) and identify the potential for a new form of resolution – a transformative outcome that resolves the conflicts through adoption of a superordinate logic. Drawing on the history of Baylor University, we illustrate different forms of resolution, proposing its most recent efforts may represent a transformative outcome. We close by presenting a model for resolving institutional contradictions which suggest some resolutions may trigger cycles of institutionalization and deinstitutionalization when they are inherently unstable because they mitigate rather than resolve the conflict between institutional logics.
Details
Keywords
Stephen G. Bronars, Melissa Famulari, Paul Bingley and Niels Westergard-Nielsen