Search results

1 – 2 of 2
To view the access options for this content please click here
Book part

Roger D. Blair and Jill Boylston Herndon

In United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., United Shoe Machinery (USM) was found guilty of illegal monopolization due to its leasing practices. Existing scholarship…

Abstract

In United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., United Shoe Machinery (USM) was found guilty of illegal monopolization due to its leasing practices. Existing scholarship on this case largely focuses on the issue of leasing versus selling. In this article, we provide a more comprehensive analysis of this important decision. In addition, we examine USM’s antitrust experience before and after the famous 1953 case. We find that USM’s business practices were largely procompetitive and, therefore, did not warrant condemnation.

Details

Antitrust Law and Economics
Type: Book
ISBN: 978-0-76231-115-6

To view the access options for this content please click here

Abstract

Details

Antitrust Law and Economics
Type: Book
ISBN: 978-0-76231-115-6

1 – 2 of 2