Search results

This chapter presents a brief history of the James Partridge Award from its founding in 1997 to the present day.

The history of the James Partridge Award is told as a narrative account. Both authors were personally involved in the founding and early development of the award.

The James Partridge Award has celebrated the accomplishments of African American information professionals since the first award was presented in 1998. The award is an important part of the Conference on Inclusion and Diversity in Library and Information Science.

The honor of editing the 30th volume of Advances in Librarianship posed a challenge of how to acknowledge changes in the profession over three and a half decades, while continuing a tradition of identifying new trends and innovations. The series aims to present a variety of aspects of the field of librarianship through the publication of critical articles and surveys, based on the published literature, research in progress, and current developments, relating to all segments of the profession and related topics. Contributing authors are encouraged to address provocative and stimulating topics that will ensure that trends are identified and research results of interest are made available quickly in a rapidly changing profession. Though authors in the past have been encouraged to add an historical perspective, those contributing to this volume were invited especially to celebrate the history of the past 36 years by reflecting, as appropriate, on advances made in their topic since the first volume of the series was published in 1970.

Health promotion and rehabilitation models of care are valuable for persons with chronic health conditions, but when these individuals are dependent on a life-maintaining technology, such as kidney dialysis, a cure-oriented model may dominate the system within which they receive care. Providers can preserve their monopoly over expert treatment knowledge by defining the key care issues, by limiting patients’ access to expert knowledge, and by discrediting the patient as a responsible actor. Multiple care paradigms can benefit patients with chronic conditions, however, empowering the patient-actor to collaborate with the clinician to maximize functioning and well-being as well as patient survival.