Books and journals Case studies Expert Briefings Open Access
Advanced search

Search results

31 – 40 of over 3000
To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 11 April 2008

Benchmarking the poultry meat supply chain

L. Manning, R. Baines and S. Chadd

The purpose of this paper is to analyse how a pre‐requisite programme and key performance indicators can be developed within an information management system in order to…

HTML
PDF (326 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to analyse how a pre‐requisite programme and key performance indicators can be developed within an information management system in order to manage food safety, animal welfare and business performance criteria effectively in the poultry meat supply chain and seek to deliver continuous improvement.

Design/methodology/approach

Desk research was carried out in order to develop the research model. Competitive benchmarking with a group of broiler growers was used to determine the most appropriate performance indicators that could differentiate both operational and financial performance.

Findings

Supply chain benchmarking is more than a comparative analysis of cost structure, indeed it can be argued that if not effectively implemented, benchmarking techniques can focus too much on historic data rather than identifying and implementing current best practice, knowledge transfer and being able to initiate change within the business cycle. Effective livestock benchmarking requires a detailed understanding of the processes undertaken in order to determine the ideas and information that needs to be shared both vertically and horizontally in the chain which in turn will deliver compliance with stakeholder requirements and drive continuous improvement.

Research limitations/implications

The limitations of the research have been discussed in the paper.

Originality/value

This research is of value to those working in the poultry meat supply chain.

Details

Benchmarking: An International Journal, vol. 15 no. 2
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770810864866
ISSN: 1463-5771

Keywords

  • Benchmarking
  • Performance measures
  • Quality management
  • Poultry
  • Supply chain management

To view the access options for this content please click here
Book part
Publication date: 28 January 2003

Neurobiology of the Mammalian Circadian System: Oscillators, Pacemakers, and Pathways

Alan M. Rosenwasser

HTML
PDF (4 MB)

Abstract

Details

Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology
Type: Book
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-0951(03)80005-1
ISBN: 978-0-12-542118-8

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 March 1982

AN H‐FIELD SOLUTION FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC SCATTERING BY A CONDUCTING BODY OF REVOLUTION

Joseph R. MAUTZ and Roger F. HARRINGTON

The magnetic field integral equation for electromagnetic scattering from a perfectly conducting body of revolution is solved by the method of moments. A Fourier series in…

HTML
PDF (855 KB)

Abstract

The magnetic field integral equation for electromagnetic scattering from a perfectly conducting body of revolution is solved by the method of moments. A Fourier series in ø is used. The t dependence of the expansion functions is subsectional. Pulses are used for the ø component of the unknown electric current induced on the surface S of the body of revolution. Triangles divided by the cylindrical coordinate radius are used for the t component. Here, t and ø are orthogonal coordinates on S, t being the arc length along the generating curve of S and ø the azimuthal angle.

Details

COMPEL - The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering, vol. 1 no. 3
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb009969
ISSN: 0332-1649

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 17 May 2013

Double loop learning in the Indian two‐wheeler service sector

Virupaxi Bagodi and Biswajit Mahanty

The purpose of this paper is to explore the rationale for the lack of growth in the two‐wheeler service sector despite an exponential growth in the number of two‐wheelers…

HTML
PDF (432 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to explore the rationale for the lack of growth in the two‐wheeler service sector despite an exponential growth in the number of two‐wheelers on Indian roads.

Design/methodology/approach

The data of a premier manufacturer were gathered to develop a system dynamics model. Policy experimentation was carried out after validating the model.

Findings

The results corroborate that a mere increase in the number of facilities is inadequate for sustainable growth. Improving service quality is vital for sustainable growth of the service sector.

Practical implications

The system dynamics model unveils facts that otherwise would remain obscured. It is very useful for real‐world managers in carrying out policy experimentation to understand the effect of one variable on the other. Managers can design effective policies only through double‐loop learning.

Originality/value

The complexity of the system increases as the business grows. Managers need to adopt double‐loop learning to achieve true growth in capacity, revenue, and the bottom line. The paper demonstrates the essence of double‐loop learning in the two‐wheeler service sector.

Details

The Learning Organization, vol. 20 no. 4/5
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-04-2012-0029
ISSN: 0969-6474

Keywords

  • Double‐loop learning
  • Indian two‐wheeler service sector
  • System dynamics
  • Road vehicles
  • India

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 November 2006

Achieving internal process benchmarking: guidance from BASF

Mario Binder, Ben Clegg and Wolfgang Egel‐Hess

The purpose of the work discussed in this paper is to understand, analyse and benchmark the “Packing and Filling” processes within BASF. A benchmarking project is…

HTML
PDF (237 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the work discussed in this paper is to understand, analyse and benchmark the “Packing and Filling” processes within BASF. A benchmarking project is described in detail which aimed to cover sites in different countries that supplied many different variants of finished goods in order to establish best practice and then to generate some options for their implementation.

Design/methodology/approach

The project used an adaptation of accepted benchmarking methodology combined with other techniques (such as rich picture generation, and cluster analysis) to maximise the insight generated.

Findings

The findings of the research showed that one of the main factors effecting the process was how third parties were used (e.g. extent and nature of out‐sourcing, and its degree of centralisation).

Research limitations/implications

The exercise was challenged by the selection of suitably similar benchmarking candidates because the environment was complex and highly varied; the paper explains practical solutions for dealing with this challenge.

Practical limitations

Strategic and tactical options are outlined at the end of the paper and will have applicability to other organisations and industries that are looking to find the answers to frequently asked questions about how to successfully implement an internal process benchmarking project in a large complex organisation that has high variety in end products and delivery methods.

Originality/value

The methodology described in this paper is of a proprietary and unique nature. The paper is structured around some key questions commonly asked of benchmarking, and the answers are provided via a real in‐depth case study from BASF that spans 4 sites in 3 countries using 15 different filling lines.

Details

Benchmarking: An International Journal, vol. 13 no. 6
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770610709040
ISSN: 1463-5771

Keywords

  • Benchmarking
  • Performance measures
  • Continuous production
  • Operations management
  • Chemical industries

To view the access options for this content please click here
Book part
Publication date: 15 September 2014

Improving Resident Outcomes in State Medicaid Nursing Facility Long-Term Care Programs: Augmenting CMS Surveys with Modest Changes to a Few State Program Features

Charles Lockhart, Kristin Klopfenstein, Jean Giles-Sims and Cathan Coghlan

Federal and state governments collaborate on state Medicaid nursing facility long-term care (SMNF-LTC) programs. These programs are increasingly expensive as the…

HTML
PDF (208 KB)
EPUB (278 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

Federal and state governments collaborate on state Medicaid nursing facility long-term care (SMNF-LTC) programs. These programs are increasingly expensive as the baby-boomers retire. Yet serious resident outcome problems continue in spite of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) extensive process-focused regulatory efforts. This study identifies a promising and simpler auxiliary path for improving resident outcomes.

Methodology/approach

Drawing on a longitudinal (1997–2005), 48-state data set and panel-corrected, time-series regression, we compare the effects on resident outcomes of CMS process-focused surveys and four minimally regulated program structural features on which the states vary considerably.

Findings

We find that each of these four structural features exerts a greater effect on resident outcomes than process quality.

Research limitations/implications

We suggest augmenting current process-focused regulation with a less arduous approach of more extensive regulation of these program features.

Originality/values of chapter

To date SMNF-LTC program regulation has focused largely on member facility processes. While regulating processes is appropriate, we show that regulating program structural features directly, an arguably easier task, might well produce considerable improvement in the quality of resident outcomes.

Details

Technology, Communication, Disparities and Government Options in Health and Health Care Services
Type: Book
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0275-495920140000032021
ISBN: 978-1-78350-645-3

Keywords

  • Long-term care
  • Medicaid; nursing facilities
  • nursing facility long-term care
  • nursing facility resident outcomes

Content available
Article
Publication date: 14 January 2021

An analysis of a benchmarking initiative to help government entities to learn from best practices – the “Dubai We Learn” initiative

Robin Mann, Dotun Adebanjo, Ahmed Abbas, Zeyad Mohammad El Kahlout, Ahmad Abdullah Al Nuseirat and Hazza Khalfan Al Neaimi

This paper aims to investigate the mechanisms for managing coordinated benchmarking projects and the outcomes achieved from such coordination. While there have been many…

Open Access
HTML
PDF (455 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to investigate the mechanisms for managing coordinated benchmarking projects and the outcomes achieved from such coordination. While there have been many independent benchmarking studies comparing the practices and performance of public sector organisations, there has been little research on initiatives that involve coordinating multiple benchmarking projects within public sector organisations or report on the practices implemented and results from benchmarking projects. This research will be of interest to centralised authorities wishing to encourage and assist multiple organisations in undertaking benchmarking projects.

Design/methodology/approach

The study adopts a case study methodology. Data were collected on the coordinating mechanisms and the experiences of the individual organisations over a one-year period.

Findings

The findings show successful results (financial and non-financial) across all 13 benchmarking projects, thus indicating the success of a coordinated approach to managing multiple projects. The study concluded by recommending a six-stage process for coordinating multiple benchmarking projects.

Originality/value

This research gives new insights into the application and benefits from benchmarking because of the open access the research team had to the “Dubai We Learn” initiative. To the authors’ knowledge the research was unique in being able to report accurately on the outcome of 13 benchmarking projects with all projects using the TRADE benchmarking methodology.

Details

International Journal of Excellence in Government, vol. 2 no. 1
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEG-11-2018-0006
ISSN: 2516-4384

Keywords

  • Benchmarking
  • Public sector
  • Dubai
  • Benchmarking models
  • TRADE
  • Best practice

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 1 July 2019

An analysis of a structured benchmarking project: The case of Dubai Electricity and Water Authority’s benchmarking project

Ahmad Abdullah Al Nuseirat, Zeyad Mohammad El Kahlout, Ahmed Abbas, Dotun Adebanjo, Prattana Punnakitikashem and Robin Mann

The purpose of this paper is to investigate a benchmarking project carried out by the Dubai Electricity and Water Authority (DEWA) as part of a structured benchmarking…

HTML
PDF (291 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to investigate a benchmarking project carried out by the Dubai Electricity and Water Authority (DEWA) as part of a structured benchmarking initiative. The project was based on the TRADE benchmarking methodology and this paper examines the tools, activities and outcomes that relate to each stage of the adopted methodology.

Design/methodology/approach

This study is based on case study methodology. Data were collected from various sources including analysis of project reports written by DEWA’s benchmarking team reporting on their activities during the project. Data were also collected from four project presentations given at different stages of the project. In addition, the research team held three meetings with the DEWA benchmarking team at different stages of the benchmarking project.

Findings

The results show the key challenges and successes faced during each stage of the benchmarking project. It indicates the actions taken to overcome the challenges and the role played by internal and external stakeholders in facilitating the success of the benchmarking project.

Practical implications

The study presents information that would guide organisations that wish to carry out a benchmarking project – and particularly those implementing benchmarking for the first time. The study provides a summary of the key lessons learnt by DEWA’s benchmarking team as a guide for other organisations.

Originality/value

Academic research has not adequately examined and analysed the stage-by-stage elements of a benchmarking project from the perspective of the implementing organisation. This study addresses this gap by detailing and analysing the experiences of a benchmarking project by tracking the stage-by-stage activities of the benchmarking team.

Details

Benchmarking: An International Journal, vol. 26 no. 5
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-02-2018-0032
ISSN: 1463-5771

Keywords

  • Benchmarking
  • Dubai
  • DEWA
  • DGEP
  • TRADE benchmarking methodology

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 21 August 2017

Scientific progress on strategic management in hospitality and tourism: a state-of-the-art

Fevzi Okumus, Mehmet Ali Köseoglu, Alfonso Morvillo and Mehmet Altin

The main purpose of this study is to offer a critical review of studies of scientific progress of strategic management (SM) research in the hospitality and tourism field (H&T).

HTML
PDF (117 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

The main purpose of this study is to offer a critical review of studies of scientific progress of strategic management (SM) research in the hospitality and tourism field (H&T).

Design/methodology/approach

This study was conducted through a critical literature review based on three dimensions: intellectual, conceptual and social structures of SM research.

Findings

The boundaries of SM under the three dimensions (intellectual, conceptual and social structure) are addressed. Based on these three components, SM in hospitality and tourism realm shows a discursive structure. There are few studies assessing the evolution of SM research in the H&T industry. However, all of these studies are review papers that explored the boundaries of SM research in H&T by using limited keywords to find SM papers, and generally considered papers which are published in a few leading H&T journals.

Research limitations/implications

This study focused on only H&T journals to elaborate the boundaries of SM in H&T. The findings of this study can help researchers (re)design research agendas to contribute to both mainstream and H&T industry SM literature and to enhance the essential elements of theory development in SM research related to H&T industry.

Originality/value

This is one of the first studies assessing the development of SM research related to hospitality and tourism by considering the boundaries of SM in three issues: intellectual, conceptual and social structure.

Details

Tourism Review, vol. 72 no. 3
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-03-2017-0047
ISSN: 1660-5373

Keywords

  • Tourism
  • Hospitality
  • Intellectual structure
  • Conceptual structure
  • Strategic management
  • State of art
  • Social structure

To view the access options for this content please click here
Article
Publication date: 17 September 2019

Process owners in business process management: a systematic literature review

Kjersti Berg Danilova

The purpose of this paper is to determine the state-of-the-art in research on process owners, a key role within business process management and process governance, and…

HTML
PDF (264 KB)

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to determine the state-of-the-art in research on process owners, a key role within business process management and process governance, and thus to increase our understanding of the role of process owners.

Design/methodology/approach

The author conducts a systematic literature review of research shedding light on the role of process owners. The review includes 100 academic papers and 10 books on BPM.

Findings

Findings from the review demonstrate the significance of appointing process owners and showcase process owners’ role and responsibilities, as well as obstacles to and enablers of effective process ownership.

Originality/value

Based on the findings from the review, the author proposes a comprehensive framework on process ownership. The review provides a knowledge base for future research to build upon and can serve as a guide for practitioners. The review also identifies several research gaps and opportunities for future research.

Details

Business Process Management Journal, vol. 25 no. 6
Type: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-05-2017-0123
ISSN: 1463-7154

Keywords

  • Business process management
  • BPM
  • Process owner
  • Business process governance
  • Business process change
  • Literature review

Access
Only content I have access to
Only Open Access
Year
  • Last week (10)
  • Last month (32)
  • Last 3 months (84)
  • Last 6 months (161)
  • Last 12 months (289)
  • All dates (3131)
Content type
  • Article (2607)
  • Book part (411)
  • Earlycite article (111)
  • Case study (2)
31 – 40 of over 3000
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication sitemap

Policies and information

  • Privacy notice
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window
  • Chair of Trustees governance statement Opens in new window
  • COVID-19 policy Opens in new window
Manage cookies

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald Engage?

    You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here.
    You can also find out more about Emerald Engage.

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Questions & More Information

    Answers to the most commonly asked questions here